Skip to main content

Security report for broadcastmed.com

BroadcastMed · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BroadcastMed is a specialized company focused on medical education and video production, offering a comprehensive library of healthcare-related multimedia content including videos, podcasts, courses, and articles. Their services cater primarily to healthcare professionals, medical associations, hospitals, and pharmaceutical and medical device industries. The company provides a suite of marketing and educational solutions such as branded content hubs, email marketing, virtual and hybrid event solutions, and data analysis, positioning itself as a key player in healthcare media and education. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including FarCry CMS, jQuery, and multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Marketo, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo. The site is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, some security headers are not explicitly present, and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure third-party scripts but lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the professional presentation and active content suggest legitimate operations. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, indicating basic GDPR compliance. Overall, the website scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security posture, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and business credibility transparency. The absence of WHOIS data and direct contact information are notable gaps. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving transparency around business and contact information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of broadcastmed.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching broadcastmed.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BroadcastMed operates in the healthcare and media sectors, providing specialized content and marketing solutions for medical education. Their market positioning is that of an established content provider with a large library and tailored services for healthcare professionals and organizations. The business model revolves around content creation, distribution, and marketing services, likely generating revenue through client engagements and partnerships. The target customers include hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and professional associations. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem including major marketing and analytics platforms. Growth indicators include a rich content catalog and active use of digital marketing tools. However, the lack of visible direct contact information and WHOIS transparency may impact trust with some clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and use of secure, reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. The WHOIS data absence is a minor concern but does not directly imply compromise. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance its security culture and compliance visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BroadcastMed
Description
BroadcastMed is a company specializing in medical education and video production, offering a large library of healthcare videos, podcasts, courses, and articles. They provide solutions for medical education, branded content, email marketing, virtual and hybrid events, and data analysis targeting healthcare professionals and organizations.
Key services
Healthcare video production, Medical education content distribution, Branded content hubs, Email marketing, Virtual and hybrid event solutions, Reporting and data analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Slick Carousel, AddThis, HubSpot, Marketo, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Zendesk Widget, Pushly SDK, BlueConic
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure third-party analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Hotjar, Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo, Hotjar, Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Marketo, BlueConic, AddThis, Pushly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and warrants monitoring
  4. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with FarCry CMS, jQuery, and multiple third-party marketing and analytics integrations such as HubSpot, Marketo, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo. Hosting is on Amazon AWS with media assets served from S3 buckets. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely impacted by multiple external scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or legacy technologies detected. Opportunities exist to optimize script loading and enhance security headers for better protection and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with broadcastmed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review broadcastmed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.