Skip to main content

Security report for broadcastmed.com

Conexiant · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conexiant is a well-established healthcare content and education platform, founded in 2001, positioning itself as a leading global destination for trusted clinical content and healthcare education. The website targets healthcare professionals and organizations, offering a broad library of educational resources and audience engagement services. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, with a CMS likely based on Umbraco. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. However, contact information and terms of service are not clearly presented, which could impact user trust and legal compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching broadcastmed.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conexiant operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on delivering clinical content and educational resources to healthcare professionals. Its business model revolves around content aggregation, audience engagement, and education delivery, likely monetized through partnerships and marketing services. The company benefits from a mature domain and partnerships with entities like BroadcastMed and Baptist Health resources, enhancing its market reach. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to audience engagement. Growth indicators include extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics platforms. The absence of explicit contact details and terms of service suggests areas for operational improvement. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple marketing and analytics providers, which supports its business intelligence capabilities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized changes. The use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation is a security gap that could expose DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Security best practices are generally followed, but improvements in publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC are recommended to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a comprehensive terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conexiant
Description
The leading global healthcare destination that combines the most trusted clinical content, the deepest audience engagement, and the broadest education library.
Key services
Clinical content delivery, Audience engagement, Healthcare education library
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, AdRoll, Pushly SDK, Marketo Munchkin, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot pixel, Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Marketo, Pushly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit contact information or security policies found on homepage.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  7. Website content is professional and healthcare focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity), and marketing tools (Marketo, AdRoll, Pushly). Hosting is on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS and cookie data. The CMS is likely Umbraco, suggested by domain references and cookies. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism powered by Cookiebot, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and potential complexity from multiple third-party scripts. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with broadcastmed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review broadcastmed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.