Skip to main content

Security report for bregards.com

NESS · Telecommunications · Latvia

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NESS is a Latvian communication agency specializing in multichannel business communication solutions, marketing automation, and customer engagement. The company targets businesses of all sizes, offering tools and services to enhance client retention and ROI through personalized communication channels such as SMS, email, WhatsApp, and web chat. With over 16 years of experience and a client base exceeding 500 companies, NESS positions itself as a reliable partner in the telecommunications and marketing technology sector. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for user experience and SEO. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern plugins and uses Cloudflare DNS for performance and security. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, though some security headers are missing and DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying on a detailed contact form for inquiries. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence with moderate tracking and marketing tools integrated. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and improving direct contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bregards.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NESS operates in the telecommunications and marketing technology sector, focusing on providing communication solutions that integrate multiple channels for business clients. Their competitive advantage lies in combining various communication platforms into unified solutions, backed by data analysis and automation. The business model is B2B service-oriented, targeting small to large enterprises seeking to improve customer engagement and marketing effectiveness. The company demonstrates growth through a diverse client portfolio and a broad service offering including GDPR compliance support. Partnerships with major social media platforms and marketing tools indicate a well-established ecosystem. The website content and client logos reinforce credibility and market presence in Latvia and potentially the Baltic region.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which may impact trust for security-conscious clients. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint but is managed with cookie consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and client trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers for improved accessibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NESS
Description
NESS is a communication agency offering professional communication solutions for businesses, helping them engage customers through multiple channels and personalized communication.
Key services
Multichannel communication, Marketing automation, Customer engagement, Integration services, GDPR compliance support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual), Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer protection on domain
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs, GetResponse, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, GetResponse Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
GetResponse, Sendinblue (Brevo)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian with multilingual support.
  3. Strong focus on multichannel communication solutions for businesses.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  7. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with consent management.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support, indicating a mature content management approach. The tech stack includes jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and Gandi SAS registrar, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site uses multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Ahrefs, and GetResponse, integrated with cookie consent management. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which should be addressed to strengthen security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bregards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bregards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.