Skip to main content

Security report for braziliandicks.com

Global Domains International, Inc. DBA DomainCostClub.com · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BrazilianDicks.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in gay pornographic content with a focus on Brazilian performers. The site operates primarily as an affiliate marketing and membership platform, targeting adult users aged 18 or 21 and above depending on jurisdiction. The business is small scale, with a longstanding domain registration dating back to 2003, managed by Global Domains International, a known domain registrar and service provider. The website content is basic but functional, with clear age gating and legal disclaimers to comply with adult content regulations. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including CSS and JavaScript, with Google Analytics for tracking and AWS for DNS hosting. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS detection and shows moderate performance and mobile optimization. SEO is basic with minimal metadata and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Security posture is weak, with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the content. Security-wise, the site demonstrates minimal best practices, including domain transfer protection and compliance with 18 U.S.C. 2257 record-keeping requirements. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of cookie consent and security headers presents compliance and security risks. Overall risk is moderate due to the nature of the content and limited security controls. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS enforcement and security headers, adding cookie consent for privacy compliance, publishing security and incident response policies, enabling DNSSEC, and improving transparency and trust signals. These steps will enhance user trust, regulatory compliance, and reduce security risks associated with adult content delivery platforms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching braziliandicks.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche adult entertainment sector, focusing on gay Brazilian content. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing and membership subscriptions, leveraging partnerships with payment processors such as Epoch and CCBill. The domain's long history and registration with a reputable registrar support operational stability. The target audience is adult consumers seeking explicit content. The site lacks direct contact information or social media presence, relying on external partner domains for legal and payment infrastructure. Growth potential is limited by basic technical implementation and minimal marketing sophistication. The partnership ecosystem includes domain services, payment gateways, and affiliate networks, which are critical for revenue generation and compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The site enforces domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are standard best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, indicating limited preparedness for security events. The absence of cookie consent and unclear HTTPS enforcement raise privacy compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS enforcement with HSTS and ensure all site content loads securely.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Global Domains International, Inc. DBA DomainCostClub.com
Description
Adult entertainment website featuring sexually explicit material targeted at adults interested in gay pornographic content.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Affiliate marketing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, AWS DNS, Basic CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • 18 U.S.C. 2257 compliance statement

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content portal with explicit material warnings and age gating.
  2. No forms detected on the splash page; entry is via affiliate link.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via external link.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism present despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. Basic SEO metadata present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Use of multiple external domains for payment and affiliate tracking.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and registered with a reputable registrar.
  10. Website content and business model are typical for adult affiliate marketing sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, supplemented by Google Analytics for user tracking. DNS is managed via Amazon AWS nameservers, indicating reliable hosting infrastructure. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting limited technical complexity. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO metadata is minimal, lacking structured data or Open Graph tags. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for easier content management, improving mobile responsiveness, and integrating advanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with braziliandicks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review braziliandicks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.