Skip to main content

Security report for brangs-heinrich.de

Brangs + Heinrich · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brangs + Heinrich is a German-based company specializing in packaging solutions, including stretch films and other protective packaging materials. The company targets business customers requiring packaging and securing products, positioning itself as a solutions provider in the manufacturing sector. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure, including common plugins for multilingual support, forms, and search functionality. The use of Cookiebot for cookie consent demonstrates a commitment to privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not detected and incident response information is absent. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in explicit contact information and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brangs-heinrich.de

This scan found 25 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention brangs-heinrich.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for brangs-heinrich.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate brangs-heinrich.de and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
5
Registered
5
Resolving
5
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • br••••••••••••.deMediumomission
  • br•••.gs-heinrich.deLowsubdomain
  • br•••••••••••.ch.deLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of brangs-heinrich.de with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on packaging products and services. Its business model is B2B, serving industries needing packaging solutions. The website content and metadata indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. The use of HubSpot and Google Analytics suggests active marketing and customer engagement efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company maintains compliance with GDPR through comprehensive cookie management and privacy policies. The absence of terms of service and explicit contact details may limit user engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable cookie consent mechanism, indicating good privacy practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is found, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of up-to-date libraries like jQuery 3.7.1 is positive, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Add clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brangs + Heinrich
Description
Der Lösungsanbieter für Verpackungen
Key services
Verpackungen, Stretchfolien, Packaging solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Contact Form 7, SearchWP
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, HubSpot, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for forms and multilingual support.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; contact info likely on separate pages not included in HTML snippet.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  5. No terms of service detected.
  6. Good use of SEO and meta tags including Open Graph.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Google Tag Manager. It uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management and HubSpot for marketing automation. The site is hosted on servers indicated by dpn.de nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brangs-heinrich.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brangs-heinrich.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.