Skip to main content

Security report for bosig.lv

Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glastech.lv is a Latvian company specializing in the glass industry with over 20 years of experience. The company offers a wide range of products and services including glass processing equipment, glass package production machinery, aluminum profile processing tools, glass transportation equipment, and related services such as trade in used equipment. Their target audience primarily consists of businesses operating in the glass manufacturing and processing sectors. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, indicating a digital presence focused on B2B sales and service. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, though some technical improvements could enhance performance and security. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but the absence of security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces trust but the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with recommendations to enhance security headers, privacy compliance, and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bosig.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glastech.lv holds a stable position in the manufacturing sector focused on glass and aluminum profile processing equipment. Their business model is B2B, providing specialized machinery and materials to industry clients. The company leverages a WooCommerce platform for product catalog and sales, indicating a direct sales channel. The presence of detailed product categories and service offerings suggests a comprehensive portfolio aimed at glass industry professionals. Contact information and legal pages are clearly provided, supporting business credibility. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a focused niche with potential for growth through enhanced digital marketing and security practices.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating limited transparency on security governance. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests that the company may not have formalized vulnerability management processes. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits the ability to verify domain legitimacy fully. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with key areas for improvement including security headers implementation, incident response documentation, and enhanced privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Seek to obtain and publish WHOIS information or use a verified domain registration to improve trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Company with over 20 years in the glass industry offering glass processing equipment, glass package production equipment, instruments for glass work, raw materials for glass package production, glass lamination films, aluminum profile processing equipment, window and door production equipment, software and production planning, tools and materials, glass transportation equipment, lifting devices, warehouse solutions, and service including trade with used equipment.
Key services
Glass processing equipment, Glass package production equipment, Aluminum profile processing equipment, Glass transportation equipment, Service and trade of used equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce site focused on glass industry equipment and services.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  3. Privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages exist and are linked in the footer.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML source; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented for form protection.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies found on the site.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. Site content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It uses jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for frontend interactivity and form security. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google domains, indicating reliance on external CDNs for fonts and reCAPTCHA. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags but could be enhanced with structured data and improved content metadata. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium business website but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bosig.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bosig.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.