Skip to main content

Security report for borga.no

Borga Stålbygg · Manufacturing · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Borga Stålbygg is a Norwegian company specializing in the manufacturing and construction of steel buildings, including steel halls and sandwich building solutions. With over 50 years of industry experience, Borga positions itself as an expert and trusted provider in the steel construction sector. Their business model focuses on quality production and full control of the supply chain, targeting businesses and individuals seeking durable and modern steel building solutions. The website reflects a professional and established market presence with consistent branding and comprehensive product information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, integrating modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with good performance and accessibility standards. Security best practices are observed, including HTTPS enforcement and security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The security posture is solid with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits full domain trust analysis. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professional, with moderate to high trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, adding vulnerability disclosure information, enhancing accessibility features, and maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries to sustain security and compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching borga.no

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Borga Stålbygg operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on steel building products and turnkey steel halls. Their competitive advantage lies in over five decades of experience and full control over the production chain, ensuring quality and reliability. The business model is B2B and B2C, serving construction companies, developers, and end customers. Revenue streams likely include product sales and construction services. The company targets customers in Norway and possibly neighboring regions. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a professional digital presence. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. Growth indicators include active e-commerce integration and modern marketing tools. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, customer trust, and digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts were found, which is a gap in transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of modern analytics and tracking tools is balanced with privacy compliance measures. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is common but limits full domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is good, with room for improvement in published security policies and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Borga AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Borga Stålbygg
Description
Borga Stålbygg har over 50 års erfaring med produksjon av byggeplater og bygging av stålhaller og vi er eksperter på stålhaller, stålplater og sandwichbygg. Så lenge vi finnes på markedet vil det alltid være enkelt å kjøpe og bygge en moderne stålhall. Vi utvikler og selger kvalitetsløsninger og kontrollerer hele kjeden selv.
Key services
Production of building plates, Construction of steel halls, Sales of sandwich building solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, WooCommerce 9.9.4, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, jQuery 2.1.3, Photoswipe, Bravo Cloudflare Video, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Content Security Policy
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. Business appears established and professional
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, and Typekit and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs and scripts. No major technical debt or outdated components were detected, but the jQuery version is somewhat old (2.1.3), which could be updated. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with borga.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review borga.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.