Skip to main content

Security report for boomerangtv.co.uk

Other · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed URL is a consent management subpage under the domain consent.youtube.com, which is a subdomain of youtube.com owned by Google. The page serves as a user interface for managing consent preferences, likely related to GDPR or regional privacy compliance. It does not contain substantive business information, contact details, or privacy policies directly on this page. The technical infrastructure relies heavily on JavaScript and Google-hosted resources, consistent with Google's internal consent management systems. Due to the nature of the page as a consent UI, it is minimal in content and does not provide typical website business or security information. The security posture cannot be fully assessed from this page alone, but given the association with YouTube and Google, it is presumed to be managed under Google's robust security frameworks. Overall, this page is a functional component of YouTube's compliance mechanisms rather than a standalone business website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boomerangtv.co.uk

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This subdomain is part of YouTube's ecosystem, owned by Google, serving a regulatory compliance function rather than a commercial business front. It supports YouTube's global operations by providing consent management for users in regulated regions. The business model is advertising and subscription-based video streaming, but this page itself does not engage in direct business activities. The target audience is YouTube users subject to privacy regulations. No direct revenue or partnership information is available from this page. The domain's role is essential for compliance but does not represent a separate business entity.

Security posture

The page is served over HTTPS and includes scripts from trusted Google domains, indicating a secure delivery infrastructure. However, no explicit security headers or policies are visible in the provided data. The page does not expose sensitive data or forms that collect personal information directly on this interface. The lack of WHOIS data is expected for a subdomain and does not indicate risk. No vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations are evident from the limited content. Incident response and security policy details are not present on this page but are likely managed centrally by Google.

Recommendations

  1. Provide direct links to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the consent page for transparency.
  2. Include contact information or a help/support link for users needing assistance with consent management.
  3. Ensure security headers are properly configured and visible for all consent management pages.
  4. Implement accessibility improvements to enhance usability for all users.
  5. Maintain clear documentation and public disclosure of data protection officer and incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. WHOIS query returned no match for domain; HTML content is minimal and appears to be a consent or interstitial page with no substantive content. No WAF challenge detected but content is effectively blocked or minimal for analysis. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The page is a consent management interface for YouTube, likely for GDPR or regional compliance.
  2. No substantive business or contact information is present on this page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are directly linked or visible on this page.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or addresses are present.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data.
  6. The WHOIS query failed because this is a subdomain, not a registered domain.
  7. The page contains extensive JavaScript related to consent UI and telemetry but no user-facing content.
  8. No external advertising or analytics scripts explicitly identified beyond Google domains.
  9. No forms or data collection fields visible in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. The page is minimal and likely part of a larger consent flow on YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The page uses modern JavaScript and Google-hosted resources to implement a consent UI. It lacks visible CMS or third-party frameworks beyond Google's internal libraries. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but likely benefit from Google's infrastructure. The page is minimal by design, focusing on compliance rather than content delivery. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO by adding metadata and user guidance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boomerangtv.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boomerangtv.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.