Skip to main content

Security report for bonafa.cz

Bonafa projekt s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bonafa projekt s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in the manufacturing and installation of external shading solutions for roof skylights, primarily serving industrial clients across the Czech and Slovak Republics. The company emphasizes quality workmanship, timely delivery, and comprehensive services including maintenance and consulting. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their target audience of industrial and commercial businesses. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Smartsupp Chat, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies, suggesting room for improvement in hardening defenses. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 17 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bonafa.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid regional position as a specialist in shading solutions for industrial skylights, offering a project-based business model with additional maintenance and consulting services. Their market approach targets industrial and commercial clients seeking energy-efficient and comfort-enhancing shading technologies. The presence of client references and active social media channels indicates ongoing engagement and a growing partnership ecosystem. The business operates with a small company size, founded in 2015, and maintains a consistent brand presence. Revenue streams likely derive from manufacturing, installation, and after-sales services. The website's content and structure support lead generation and client communication effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, including Google ReCAPTCHA for bot protection. However, the absence of a robust Content-Security-Policy and other security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options represents a compliance gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may limit transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, indicating limited formal vulnerability management communication. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  2. Add essential security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize exposure to vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bonafa projekt s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bonafa projekt s.r.o.
Description
Bonafa Projekt S.R.O. se specializuje na výrobu a instalaci vnějších zastínění střešních světlíků s využitím různých druhů screenových plachet. S vlastní výrobou v Beskydech a sídlem v Ostravě poskytujeme služby po celé České a Slovenské republice.
Key services
Výroba a instalace zastínění střešních světlíků, Solární panely na střešní světlíky, Údržba a servis, Doplňkové služby
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Smartsupp Chat, WebFont Loader, jQuery (implied by plugins), RoyalSlider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google ReCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Smartsupp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the business sector.
  3. Comprehensive contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact form is provided.
  4. Cookie consent banner with granular settings is implemented.
  5. Multiple analytics and marketing tools are used, with privacy considerations.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Smartsupp Chat, indicating a well-instrumented digital environment for user behavior analysis and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, enhancing user experience across devices. Hosting appears to be managed via Active24, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Technical debt is minimal, though security header implementation is lacking. Opportunities exist to improve security posture and performance optimization further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bonafa.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bonafa.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.