Skip to main content

Security report for bodyxxx.top

Other · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Bodyxxx' operates as an adult content affiliate portal primarily linking to various external adult and teen-themed websites. Its business model revolves around affiliate marketing and advertising within the adult entertainment niche, targeting an adults-only audience. The site lacks original content and instead relies heavily on banners, external links, and download links to adult videos. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies such as jQuery and Nivo Slider, with multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts embedded. The hosting and domain registration are privacy protected, typical for adult content sites, but no CMS or modern frameworks are detected. Security posture is weak, with no security headers, no DNSSEC, and multiple external scripts increasing risk. Privacy compliance is absent, with no privacy or cookie policies, and no GDPR indicators. Business credibility is low due to lack of contact information or trust signals. Overall, the site scores poorly on content quality, security, and compliance, reflecting a low trustworthiness profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bodyxxx.top

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bodyxxx.top, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bodyxxx.top right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bodyxxx positions itself as a niche adult affiliate marketing site, monetizing through advertising and outbound affiliate links to other adult and teen-themed websites. The site targets adult users interested in explicit content, including controversial underage-themed material. Its revenue streams likely come from affiliate commissions and ad impressions. The lack of transparency, privacy protection on WHOIS, and absence of business credentials suggest a low-profile operation typical in this industry. The site maintains partnerships with multiple adult affiliate networks and uses various ad networks for monetization. Growth indicators or professional branding are not evident, and the site appears to be a small-scale operation founded in 2021.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. While HTTPS is enabled, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are present. The site loads numerous third-party scripts from multiple ad and tracking domains, increasing the attack surface and privacy risks. No secure forms or input sanitization mechanisms are visible. DNSSEC is not enabled, and the domain uses privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. There is no evidence of incident response policies or security certifications. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and lacks compliance with modern security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and enable HSTS to enhance security posture.
  3. Reduce and audit third-party scripts to trusted sources to minimize security and privacy risks.
  4. Provide clear contact information and business credentials to improve credibility and compliance.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and review domain registration details for improved domain security and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be an adult content portal primarily linking to various external adult and teen-themed websites and banners. It offers downloads and affiliate links to other adult sites.
Key services
Affiliate linking to adult and teen-themed websites, Advertising banners, Download links to video content
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Nivo Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
PopCash, Adfly, Tubecorp, Clickadilla
Tracking pixels
Adspector
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content affiliate portal with multiple external links to explicit and underage-themed adult sites.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found.
  3. No contact information or business credentials provided.
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad and tracking scripts from multiple sources.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. Content and design quality are poor with minimal original content.
  7. Potential legal and ethical concerns due to explicit and underage-themed content.
  8. No GDPR or privacy compliance mechanisms observed.
  9. Domain uses privacy protection, common in adult content industry.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses outdated technologies such as jQuery and Nivo Slider for UI components. It relies heavily on multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts from various domains, which may impact performance and security. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows poor mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is minimal with empty meta keywords and description tags. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond registrar and DNS servers. Performance is moderate but could be improved by reducing external dependencies and optimizing assets. The site has technical debt and modernization opportunities, especially in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bodyxxx.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bodyxxx.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.