Skip to main content

Security report for boden-wand-decke.de

Other · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.boden-wand-decke.de appears to be a German-language site focused on topics related to flooring, walls, and ceilings, likely in the home improvement or construction sector. The site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Gravity Forms for form handling and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Usercentrics CMP is integrated for cookie consent management, indicating some attention to privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure includes Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and multiple external analytics and advertising services, suggesting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no explicit contact information was found in the provided content, which may impact user trust and compliance. Security headers are not detected, and SSL configuration details are not available, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, with basic content quality and moderate technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boden-wand-decke.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention boden-wand-decke.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for boden-wand-decke.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website seems to operate in the home improvement or construction niche, targeting German-speaking audiences. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, and legal disclosures limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or business model. The use of advertising and tracking technologies suggests a revenue model that may include advertising or lead generation. The site’s moderate SEO and cookie consent implementation indicate some awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the available information.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but could be significantly improved. The presence of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security certifications are visible. The integration of third-party scripts for analytics and advertising introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. The site should enhance its security policies, publish clear privacy and terms documents, and implement stronger technical security controls to improve its security maturity and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration and ensure it meets current best practices for encryption and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Usercentrics CMP, Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by origin-trial meta and preconnect to https URLs)
  • Usercentrics Consent Management Platform integration
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Adition
Tracking pixels
eTracker, DoubleVerify
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible without WAF or security challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO plugin.
  6. Includes Google reCAPTCHA for form protection.
  7. Multiple external domains related to analytics and advertising detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS implied.
  9. Content is in German language with basic content quality.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins such as Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, which provide form functionality and SEO optimization respectively. Usercentrics CMP integration demonstrates attention to cookie consent management. The site loads multiple external resources for fonts, analytics, advertising, and social media integrations. Performance appears moderate with preconnect and preload hints used for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The absence of detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration represent technical risks. The site would benefit from modernization efforts focusing on security hardening and enhanced privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boden-wand-decke.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boden-wand-decke.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.