Skip to main content

Security report for bmxtukums.lv

Biedrība, Tukuma BMX riteņbraukšanas klubs · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BMX Tukums is a local non-profit sports club based in Tukums, Latvia, focused on promoting BMX cycling among children and youth. The organization aims to create motivating conditions for children to engage in sports, enjoy positive emotions, and foster community integration. The website serves as a platform to share news, event information, training schedules, and contact details, targeting local families and BMX enthusiasts. The club operates primarily through community engagement and organizes BMX competitions and training sessions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin stack including Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, BMX Tukums presents a trustworthy and community-focused online presence with room to enhance compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bmxtukums.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club holds a niche position in the local sports community, focusing on BMX cycling for youth in Tukums. Its business model is non-commercial, relying on community participation and events. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement and a growing community. The club's registration number and bank details are provided, enhancing credibility. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited formal compliance infrastructure. The club's partnership with the web development company DRC.LV indicates professional support. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and formalizing compliance and security frameworks.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The presence of multiple WordPress plugins requires regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in security incident handling. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear consent mechanisms for data collection to improve user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība, Tukuma BMX riteņbraukšanas klubs
Registration number
40008265223
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība, Tukuma BMX riteņbraukšanas klubs
Description
Mūsu galvenais mērķis ir radīt apstākļus, kas motivētu bērnus nodarboties ar sportu, gūt prieku, pozitīvas emocijas, gūt jaunus draugus, veicināt bērnu integrēšanos mūsdienu sabiedrībā, kā rezultātā bērni justos komfortabli savā novadā un savu nākotni vēlētos saistīt ar savu pilsētu un Latviju kopumā.
Key services
BMX training sessions, Organizing BMX competitions and events, Community engagement and sports promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Stackable Ultimate Gutenberg Blocks, Contact Form 7, Responsive Lightbox, Easy Newsletter Signups, Show Hide/Collapse Expand plugin, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Jetpack Stats
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and other plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Easy Newsletter Signups
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based local BMX sports club site in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local community and youth.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies.
  10. Newsletter signup form collects email addresses without visible privacy notice.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a variety of plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Stackable Ultimate Gutenberg Blocks, indicating a modern and extensible CMS setup. The site uses jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for UI effects and functionality. Performance is moderate with preconnect and dns-prefetch optimizations for external resources. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small community website but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bmxtukums.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bmxtukums.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.