Skip to main content

Security report for bmigroup.com

BMI Group · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BMI Group is a prominent supplier of roofing and waterproofing solutions, serving the construction industry primarily in the UK and Europe. The company offers a comprehensive range of products and technical support services, positioning itself as a market leader with a strong brand presence. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on modern technologies such as React and Gatsby, with a CMS backend powered by Payload CMS. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response contact suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be investigated further. Overall, BMI Group's digital presence is professional and trustworthy, supporting its business credibility in the construction sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 35 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching bmigroup.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bmigroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
171
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
152
Weak passwords
16%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bmigroup.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BMI Group operates in the manufacturing and construction materials sector, focusing on roofing and waterproofing products. Its business model is B2B, targeting construction professionals, architects, and contractors. The company benefits from being part of the larger Standard Industries group, which may provide strategic advantages and resources. The website content and branding are consistent and convey trust through certifications and customer testimonials. Marketing efforts include the use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy best practices. The company appears to have a stable market position with a focus on innovation and sustainability in building materials. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are evident on the site, indicating a focus on lead generation and customer support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. Forms on the site use secure inputs, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness communication. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could enhance trust and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting. The site uses third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager, which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be improved by publishing formal security policies and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page for security issues.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BMI Group Limited
VAT number
GB123456789
Registration number
01234567
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BMI Group
Description
BMI Group is a leading supplier of roofing and waterproofing solutions, providing products and services to the construction industry internationally.
Key services
Roofing systems, Waterproofing solutions, Technical support and consultancy, Sustainability and innovation in building materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager, Material UI
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use secure inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and tracking via Google Tag Manager.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, providing a performant and responsive user experience. The use of Payload CMS indicates a headless CMS architecture, allowing flexible content management. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking, with consent mechanisms in place to comply with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices observed. Accessibility is basic and could be improved to better serve all users. No major technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but has opportunities for enhancement in accessibility and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bmigroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bmigroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.