Skip to main content

Security report for blueconic.net

BlueConic · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BlueConic is a technology company specializing in a Customer Growth Engine platform that leverages first-party data and AI to enable marketers and IT teams to drive real-time growth. The company targets B2C leaders and marketers seeking to optimize customer engagement and personalization through interactive experiences and a customer data platform. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content including case studies with major brands, indicating a mature market position and strong business credibility. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks and libraries such as Bootstrap, Algolia, and Google Tag Manager, with good performance and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and nonce usage, though some security headers are not explicitly detected and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though WHOIS data is unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of blueconic.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blueconic.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BlueConic operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions focused on customer data management and marketing growth. Its business model centers on enabling marketers to collect, unify, and activate first-party data in real time, powered by AI. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships and case studies with well-known brands such as PepsiCo and Electrolux. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for its platform and services. The target customers are medium to large B2C enterprises seeking advanced personalization and data-driven marketing solutions. The company maintains a robust digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting growth and customer engagement. Strategic observations include a focus on AI-powered personalization, interactive experiences, and real-time data activation, positioning BlueConic competitively in the customer data platform market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses nonce attributes in scripts to mitigate injection risks, indicating a good security baseline. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present in the HTML, which could be improved to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of incident response contact information represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and trust center, but the missing cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced headers, transparency, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  2. Add security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.
  3. Deploy a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve security communication and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BlueConic
Description
BlueConic’s Customer Growth Engine turns first-party data into real-time growth—built for marketers, powered by AI, and trusted by IT.
Key services
Customer Data Platform, Experiences by Jebbit, AI-powered segmentation, Real-time audience activation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.6.0, Algolia Search, InstantSearch.js, Splide.js, Lottie-web, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads (bat.bing.com), Marketo Forms, Intercom
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce attributes in scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads
Marketing tools
Marketo, Intercom, Algolia Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  4. Strong presence of marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected, potential GDPR compliance gap.
  6. Contact information includes phone number and contact forms but no direct emails found.
  7. Multiple case studies with reputable brands enhance trustworthiness.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. Footer includes privacy policy, terms, and trust center links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery, Algolia for search, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It uses Contentful as a CMS inferred from asset URLs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date libraries and no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and implement cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blueconic.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blueconic.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.