Skip to main content

Security report for bloomberg.co.kr

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bloomberg.co.kr is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page that blocks all content until a captcha is solved. The domain appears unregistered or inactive based on the Korean WHOIS registry response, which states the host name is not registered. Consequently, no business information, contact details, or policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure is minimal and limited to PerimeterX security scripts and Google Fonts. The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of access, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of protection against automated threats. Overall, the site is not operational or publicly accessible, resulting in a very low trust and credibility score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bloomberg.co.kr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current content as the domain is unregistered and the website is blocked by a security challenge. There is no evidence of business operations, market positioning, or services. The domain name suggests an association with Bloomberg, but no official affiliation or content is present. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable.

Security posture

The security posture is characterized by the use of PerimeterX WAF, which provides bot mitigation and access control. However, the lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of SSL/TLS configuration, security headers, or data protection practices. No privacy or incident response policies are visible. The domain's unregistered status raises concerns about legitimacy and operational security.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and maintain accurate WHOIS records to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Ensure the website content is accessible to legitimate users by configuring WAF rules appropriately.
  3. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies to comply with regulations.
  4. Deploy HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and security headers to enhance security posture.
  5. Provide clear business and contact information to improve credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

PerimeterX detected. The page is blocked by PerimeterX WAF with a captcha challenge requiring user interaction to proceed. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
px-captcha
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
PerimeterX, Roboto font, JavaScript
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PerimeterX
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully blocked by PerimeterX WAF challenge.
  2. No accessible business or contact information on the page.
  3. No metadata or structured data present beyond minimal captcha page content.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected other than the captcha challenge.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. External resources are limited to PerimeterX captcha scripts and Google Fonts.
  8. No social media or contact links present.
  9. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating domain is not registered or inactive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on PerimeterX for bot protection and uses Google Fonts for typography. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The page is a static captcha challenge with no SEO metadata or structured data. Mobile optimization is basic due to minimal content. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. The technical implementation is minimal and primarily focused on security challenge delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bloomberg.co.kr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bloomberg.co.kr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.