Skip to main content

Security report for bloggtavlingen.se

TodaysWeb Ltda. · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bloggtavlingen.se operates as a niche Swedish platform organizing blog competitions with monetary prizes and premium service incentives. It targets bloggers and blog readers interested in participating in contests. The business model revolves around hosting competitions sponsored by various companies, with a small but engaged audience. The site content is well-structured and relevant, though some dated references suggest limited recent activity. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics and social media widgets. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a baseline security posture, but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows no immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS domain registration data, reduce overall trustworthiness. The lack of clear contact information and incident response channels further limits security maturity. Overall, the site is functional and moderately professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security practices, and better transparency regarding ownership and contact details to increase trust and compliance with regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bloggtavlingen.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bloggtavlingen.se occupies a niche market in Sweden focused on blog competitions, leveraging partnerships with companies like N.nu and Blogglista.se to provide prizes and premium services. The business model is based on engaging bloggers through contests, generating revenue likely from sponsorships and premium service promotions. The target audience is bloggers and blog readers interested in contests and prizes. The site shows moderate market presence with a small subscriber base and social media engagement. Growth potential exists if subscriber numbers increase and more competitions are launched. Partnerships with related blogging platforms strengthen its ecosystem. However, limited recent activity and lack of updated WHOIS data suggest potential operational or domain management issues.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. Third-party scripts are used extensively, which could introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in compliance and proactive security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TodaysWeb Ltda.
Description
A website hosting blog competitions with prize pools of at least 5000 SEK per competition, offering prizes to all participants and new competitions monthly.
Key services
Organizing blog competitions, Providing prize distribution, Newsletter subscription for competition updates
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Twitter Widgets, Facebook Plugins, Redis caching
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of secure iframes for subscription forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Redistats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Redistats
Marketing tools
Newsletter subscription iframe, Social media follow buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Social media presence includes Twitter and Facebook pages.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics and other tracking scripts.
  6. WHOIS data for the full domain is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Site design and navigation are good but mobile optimization is basic.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture can be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) and integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics, Twitter widgets, and Facebook plugins. Redis caching is used to improve performance. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no CMS or specific frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. The site performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and responsiveness. The technical infrastructure is adequate for a small niche site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bloggtavlingen.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bloggtavlingen.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.