Skip to main content

Security report for blitz.be

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.blitz.be appears to be a minimalistic, JavaScript-heavy site with very limited visible content. The presence of Cloudflare security challenge scripts indicates that the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF), which restricts full content access and analysis. The lack of visible privacy policies, contact information, or business descriptions limits the ability to fully assess the company's market position or services. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and is hosted behind Cloudflare, indicating a contemporary infrastructure. However, the extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts suggests a focus on marketing and analytics, but without visible user consent mechanisms. The security posture is moderate due to HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, but the absence of privacy compliance and contact details reduces trust. Overall, the site’s risk profile is elevated due to limited transparency and blocked WHOIS data, recommending further investigation for business legitimacy and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blitz.be

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information, it is difficult to ascertain the company's market positioning or business model. The site appears to be related to digital services or entertainment given the linked domains and ad networks, but no explicit business description or target audience is provided. The heavy integration of advertising and tracking services indicates a revenue model possibly based on advertising or user data analytics. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The lack of contact and legal information is a competitive disadvantage and may impact customer trust.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and a strict Content-Security-Policy, which are positive security controls. However, the absence of visible privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information for incident response or data protection officers indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The Cloudflare WAF provides protection against common web threats but also limits content accessibility for analysis. No forms or inputs are present to evaluate secure data handling. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but lacks transparency and compliance completeness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Provide clear contact information including security incident and data protection officer contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  3. Enhance website content with business descriptions, terms of service, and legal disclosures to improve credibility.
  4. Review and limit third-party tracking scripts to essential services and ensure transparency to users.
  5. Consider reducing WAF challenge strictness or providing alternative access to improve content accessibility for users and analysts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Presence of Cloudflare challenge platform scripts and minimal HTML content indicates WAF blocking or challenge. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, FullStory, Datadog, Facebook Analytics, Twitter Analytics, Snapchat Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AppNexus, DoubleClick, Google Ads, Adform, Mathtag
Tracking pixels
FullStory, Facebook Pixel, Snapchat Pixel, Twitter Analytics, Datadog
Marketing tools
Appsflyer, Refiner, Smooch, Zendesk, LiveChat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly JavaScript-driven with no visible textual content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms detected.
  4. Strong presence of third-party tracking and advertising scripts.
  5. Cloudflare WAF challenge detected, limiting content accessibility.
  6. WHOIS data is blocked, reducing transparency and trust.
  7. No visible business or legal information on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies, likely React, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services. The site loads multiple third-party scripts for advertising, analytics, and customer engagement tools. The Content-Security-Policy is well configured to restrict resource loading to trusted domains. However, the site content is minimal and heavily reliant on JavaScript, which may impact SEO and accessibility. No CMS or backend platform is identified. Performance is moderate given the number of external scripts. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic and could be improved by adding semantic content and metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blitz.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blitz.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.