Skip to main content

Security report for blast.lv

SIA BLAST · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA BLAST operates a Latvian-based business specializing in powder coating, abrasive blasting, tire changing, and wheel repair services. The company targets automotive, motorcycle, bicycle owners, and industrial clients, offering competitive pricing and quality workmanship. Their market position is that of a small but established local service provider with a clear focus on metal surface treatment and tire services. Technically, the website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, but security headers and privacy compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies are missing, which presents compliance and trust gaps. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain legitimacy assessment, but the presence of verifiable contact details and social media links supports business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blast.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, focusing on metal surface finishing and tire services. Their business model combines B2C and B2B services, with revenue streams from powder coating, blasting, tire mounting, and repairs. The detailed pricing tables and online booking subdomain indicate a customer-centric approach. Partnerships with related metalworking sites and active social media presence support marketing efforts. Growth indicators include a high number of completed projects and clients displayed on the site. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a localized market focus in Latvia.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security maturity with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, which is critical for EU-based businesses. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with EU privacy laws and improve user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and minimize tracking to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA BLAST
VAT number
LV40203446396
Registration number
40203446396
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA BLAST
Description
Pulverkrāsošana un strūklošana pakalpojumi, riepu maiņa, disku remonts, metālapstrāde, ar konkurētspējīgām cenām un augstu kvalitāti.
Key services
Pulverkrāsošana, Strūklošana, Riepu maiņa un montāža, Disku remonts, Metālapstrāde
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Nivo Lightbox, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is detailed and includes phone, email, physical address, and contact form
  4. Pricing information is comprehensive and transparent
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, TikTok, Instagram
  6. Use of multiple tracking and analytics scripts without visible cookie consent
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  9. Business appears to be a small Latvian company specializing in powder coating and tire services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Bootstrap framework with jQuery and several UI libraries such as Owl Carousel and Nivo Lightbox, providing a responsive and interactive user experience. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, which helps performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site has moderate performance and basic accessibility features. Technical debt is low but could be improved by updating to more modern JavaScript frameworks and enhancing SEO and accessibility compliance. Security technical controls are minimal and should be strengthened.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blast.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blast.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.