Skip to main content

Security report for blackbookofsex.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.blackbookofsex.co.uk is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare WAF error 1014 indicating a CNAME Cross-User Banned issue. This error prevents any actual website content from being served, resulting in a lack of business information, contact details, or user-facing content. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to the domain name being invalid per Nominet UK rules, suggesting the domain is either unregistered or misconfigured. Consequently, no metadata, privacy policies, or security policies are available for analysis. From a technical perspective, the site relies on Cloudflare services but suffers from DNS misconfiguration that triggers the WAF block. No CMS, frameworks, or additional technologies are detectable. The site lacks security headers, SSL configuration details, and any form of analytics beyond Cloudflare's performance beacon. The absence of content and metadata results in poor SEO and accessibility. Security posture is weak due to the site being blocked and misconfigured. No security best practices or incident response information is present. The domain's legitimacy is questionable given the WHOIS failure and Cloudflare blocking. No privacy compliance or GDPR indicators are found. Overall, the site is non-functional and untrustworthy in its current state. Strategic recommendations include resolving the DNS and Cloudflare configuration issues to restore site availability, implementing proper security headers and HTTPS enforcement, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear contact and business information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blackbookofsex.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention blackbookofsex.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
167
Employees
0
Customers
167
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
22%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for blackbookofsex.co.uk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears inactive or improperly configured. No market positioning, business model, or target audience information is available. The site does not present any services or products. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The domain name suggests adult content, but no actual content is accessible to confirm this. The absence of business data indicates the domain is either unused or under development.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor. The site is blocked by Cloudflare due to a CNAME Cross-User Banned error, indicating DNS misconfiguration and improper use of Cloudflare services. No security headers or SSL details are present. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy policies and contact information further weakens compliance and trust. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns. Overall, the site is vulnerable to availability issues and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve Cloudflare CNAME cross-user configuration to restore website accessibility.
  2. Configure DNS records correctly to comply with Cloudflare and Nominet UK policies.
  3. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and enforce secure connections.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Cloudflare error 1014 CNAME Cross-User Banned page detected indicating site is blocked by Cloudflare WAF due to DNS misconfiguration. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare performance radar
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare performance radar
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking (error 1014).
  2. No actual website content is available for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details present.
  5. No forms or user input fields detected.
  6. External links only point to Cloudflare and related support/documentation sites.
  7. No social media or marketing links found.
  8. Technical stack limited to Cloudflare services.
  9. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  10. No analytics beyond Cloudflare performance beacon.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare but is currently blocked due to a DNS misconfiguration causing a CNAME Cross-User Banned error (HTTP 1014). No CMS or frameworks are detected. The HTML content is minimal and consists solely of the Cloudflare error page. Performance and accessibility cannot be properly assessed due to lack of content. The site uses Cloudflare's performance radar script and an XHR POST for error feedback. No SEO meta tags or structured data are present. The domain is invalid per Nominet UK rules, indicating a misconfiguration or non-registration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blackbookofsex.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blackbookofsex.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.