Skip to main content

Security report for blab.tw

B型企業協會 B Lab Taiwan · Other · Taiwan

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

B型企業協會 B Lab Taiwan is a Taiwan-based organization dedicated to promoting B Corporation certification and ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) sustainability practices. The website serves as an informational and community hub for businesses interested in becoming certified B Corporations and advancing sustainable business practices. It targets enterprises and professionals interested in ESG and corporate responsibility. The organization positions itself as a leading promoter of B Corp certification in Taiwan, offering education, training, and community engagement services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and uses libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The hosting provider is Cloudmax Inc., and the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site is moderately performant and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and structured data enhancing discoverability. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Contact information is available primarily through a contact form and social media channels, but no direct emails or phone numbers were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with better privacy compliance and security best practices. The overall risk assessment indicates a trustworthy and professional website with good business credibility but with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers, and providing clearer incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blab.tw

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the sustainability and corporate responsibility sector, focusing on B Corporation certification and ESG promotion in Taiwan. Its business model revolves around education, certification facilitation, and community building rather than direct commercial sales. The target customers are businesses seeking to improve their social and environmental impact. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement with the community and stakeholders. The organization leverages partnerships and social platforms to extend its reach. Growth indicators include active event listings and educational programs. The business maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting its market position as a key player in Taiwan's B Corp ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks. Incident response readiness is not evident from the website content. The security culture appears to be in early stages, with room for improvement in transparency and best practices. Enhancing security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response information would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
B型企業協會 B Lab Taiwan
Description
認證B型企業（B Corporations®, B Corps™）是藉由商業力量建立更具包容性和永續經濟的營利性公司，且為符合高度驗證的社會和環境績效、及當責、透明治理的企業，全球有 161 個產業和 105 個國家中有超過 9,700 家認證的 B 型企業。
Key services
B型企業認證推廣, ESG相關教育與培訓, 活動與社群經營
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js, FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is in Traditional Chinese targeting Taiwan audience.
  2. Content focuses on B Corporation certification and ESG promotion.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Contact available via contact form and social media links.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  6. No obvious security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No visible email addresses or phone numbers in HTML content.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive UI components and FontAwesome for icons. The hosting provider is Cloudmax Inc., a known registrar and hosting service. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium-sized organization but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blab.tw. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blab.tw.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.