Skip to main content

Security report for bkstr.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at https://www.bkstr.com/efollettstore/home appears to be an online store interface, likely related to educational institutions given the presence of a school selector input. However, the content is minimal with no visible product listings or detailed business information. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Angular 15, and several third-party marketing and tracking scripts including Google Adsense, Monetate, Certona, Adobe DTM, and Vantiv eProtect. Despite this, the site lacks essential compliance and trust elements such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, and contact information. Security posture is limited due to absence of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is accessible but lacks comprehensive content and compliance features, resulting in a moderate risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bkstr.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind this website likely operates in the education retail sector, providing an online storefront possibly for school-related merchandise or textbooks. The minimal content and lack of explicit business details limit insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The presence of advanced marketing tools suggests an intent to engage customers and personalize experiences. However, the absence of contact details and policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or content. The business model appears to be e-commerce focused, targeting educational institutions or students, but further details are not available.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low to moderate. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from canonical URL using https), no security headers are detected in the provided data. The site loads multiple third-party scripts which could introduce vulnerabilities if not properly managed. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or security policies. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR and privacy compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the absence of WHOIS data and security headers reduces overall trust. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices including CSP, HSTS, and clear privacy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add clear contact information including support and security incident response contacts.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Angular 15.2.9, Google Fonts, Adobe DTM, Monetate, Vantiv eProtect, Zip.co, Certona, MixedMediaViewer.js
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Monetate, Certona
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal with a search input for school selection but no visible product or business information.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Multiple third-party scripts for advertising and tracking are loaded.
  5. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating potential domain registration issues.
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  8. Website uses Angular framework and several marketing/tracking technologies.
  9. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular 15 framework, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and tracking services including Monetate, Certona, Adobe DTM, and Google Adsense. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. The site includes scripts for payment security (Vantiv eProtect) and zip.co integration. Performance appears moderate with deferred and async script loading. Accessibility features are basic with some ARIA roles present. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks visible CMS indicators and hosting provider information is not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could be improved with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bkstr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bkstr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.