Skip to main content

Security report for bjrawlive.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BJ Raw is an adult entertainment website specializing in live female cam shows and adult video content. The platform offers services such as live streaming, VIP memberships, fan clubs, and flirt rewards targeting adult viewers interested in this niche. The website's market position is that of a medium-sized niche adult entertainment provider with a focus on female performers. Technically, the site employs common web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and iovation fraud detection scripts, with a moderate level of performance and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks visible advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for user trust and regulatory compliance. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and business transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trustworthiness and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bjrawlive.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult entertainment sector with a subscription and pay-per-view model. It leverages affiliate partnerships, notably with vs4.com, to drive traffic and revenue. The target audience is adult viewers seeking live cam and video content featuring female performers. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized content and integrated fan club and VIP features. However, the lack of visible business registration, contact information, and privacy policies may hinder growth and trust. The marketing ecosystem includes Google advertising and tracking tools, indicating a focus on digital marketing. Strategic observations suggest the need for enhanced transparency and compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of fraud detection scripts like iovation. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are presented, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further weakens security readiness. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires significant improvements to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Provide visible and reliable contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance business transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Adult entertainment platform offering live cam shows and video content primarily featuring female performers.
Key services
Live Girls Cams, Adult Video Content, VIP Membership, Fan Clubs, Flirt Rewards
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, iovation Fraud Detection, Ajax, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of iovation fraud detection scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
iovation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment platform focused on live female cam shows and video content.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Use of multiple third-party tracking and fraud detection scripts.
  5. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy concerns.
  6. Site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers.
  7. Design and content quality are basic with moderate branding consistency.
  8. No visible certifications or security policies disclosed.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No data protection officer or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern web stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, integrating Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, and iovation for fraud detection. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from CDN domains, indicating a distributed hosting approach. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization considered good. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta description and keywords. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and lack of structured data for SEO. Modernization opportunities include implementing structured data, improving accessibility, and enhancing security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bjrawlive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bjrawlive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.