Skip to main content

Security report for bitavo.com

Atom · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atom operates as a specialized online marketplace offering over 200,000 premium domain names for sale, targeting businesses and entrepreneurs seeking to enhance their brand presence through high-value domain acquisitions. The website is professionally designed with a clear focus on domain sales, providing users with search and filtering capabilities to find suitable domain names. The company positions itself as a significant player in the premium domain market, leveraging a robust digital platform to facilitate transactions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Fonts, and New Relic monitoring for performance and error tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. The infrastructure appears stable with HTTPS enforced and security headers implemented, contributing to a secure browsing experience. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices such as HTTPS and security headers but lacks publicly available security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating attention to user data protection. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile primarily due to the absence of WHOIS data, which limits domain legitimacy verification. The site is operational and professional, but the unclear domain registration status suggests caution. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies and enhancing accessibility to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitavo.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atom's market positioning as a premium domain marketplace leverages a large inventory and a user-friendly platform to attract businesses and entrepreneurs. The business model focuses on domain sales and leasing, generating revenue through transactions and possibly premium services. The target customer segments include startups, established companies, and brand developers seeking valuable domain assets. The company demonstrates growth potential through its extensive domain listings and digital presence. Partnerships and integrations with domain registrars or payment processors are not explicitly identified but may exist. The company's operations emphasize digital commerce and brand enhancement services.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Atom's website is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The use of New Relic for monitoring indicates proactive performance and error tracking. However, the lack of a published security policy and incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting areas for improvement to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atom Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atom
Description
Atom offers a marketplace with over 200,000 premium domain names for sale, targeting businesses and brands seeking to secure high-value domain names to elevate their online presence.
Key services
Premium domain name sales, Domain search and filtering, Domain leasing options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, Google Fonts, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear.
  3. Professional design and clear business focus on premium domain sales.
  4. Security best practices mostly implemented but lacks explicit security policy and incident response info.
  5. Uses New Relic for monitoring and analytics.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. No adult or NSFW content present.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Google Fonts, and New Relic monitoring tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses HTTPS with appropriate security headers, contributing to a secure environment. There is no evidence of a CMS or specific hosting provider from the analyzed data. Technical debt appears minimal, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and publish additional security documentation. The infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce platform focused on domain sales.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitavo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitavo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.