Is bipc.com Safe? Security Analysis for Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
https://www.bipc.com/Check if bipc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
GDPR-aligned
Data handling
EU
Hosting region
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Unlock the full report for bipc.com
Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
via EveryPayAI Summary
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC is a large, professional law firm with a nationwide presence specializing in a broad spectrum of business law cases across key sectors such as energy, finance, healthcare, and life sciences. The firm is recognized in industry rankings and offers comprehensive legal services to business clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and accessibility tools from Monsido, ensuring good performance and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and Content-Security-Policy headers, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, which should be further investigated to confirm legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-optimized for its audience.
Detected Technologies
9 urgent findings need attention
9 high
- + 1 more findings in the full report below
Keep bipc.com under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
4 findings
65/100
GDPR Compliance
4 findings
53/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
4 findings
70/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The firm holds a strong market position as a top-ranked legal service provider in multiple industries, leveraging a broad service portfolio and a large team of attorneys. Its business model focuses on delivering specialized legal expertise to corporate clients, supported by a robust online presence and active engagement on social media platforms. The firm’s commitment to diversity, corporate responsibility, and client service excellence are key competitive advantages. The website content and structure indicate a focus on client acquisition and retention through thought leadership and industry insights. The lack of explicit contact information on the site may be a deliberate choice to direct inquiries through controlled channels. The firm’s partnership ecosystem includes referral networks and affinity groups, enhancing its market reach.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and a Content-Security-Policy header to upgrade insecure requests. The use of Google Tag Manager and Monsido scripts is managed appropriately, minimizing risk exposure. No sensitive data or credentials are exposed in the HTML content. However, the site could improve by implementing additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from incremental improvements to align with best practices.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement additional HTTP security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
✨Observations
Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC has law offices throughout the country and hundreds of lawyers who specialize in a broad spectrum of business law cases.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Content-Security-Policy header present
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the bipc.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
Current value: "same-origin"
Sensitive data may be cached
Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete bipc.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
BIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
SSL certificate expires in 60 days
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
HSTS Not Enabled
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
DNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
Domain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does bipc.com compare?
See how bipc.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the bipc.com report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
via EveryPayScan your own website
Liked the bipc.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about bipc.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published