Skip to main content

Security report for biotech.at

BIO-TECH Betriebshygiene GmbH · Other · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BIO-TECH Betriebshygiene GmbH is a small Austrian company specializing in hygiene services and training primarily targeting industrial and gastronomy businesses as well as private customers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content in German. The business model focuses on providing hygiene solutions and educational offerings, positioning itself as a niche regional service provider. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common optimization plugins such as Autoptimize and lazy loading for images, delivering moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though lacking advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a privacy policy and cookie banner, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with no signs of suspicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biotech.at

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hygiene service sector, serving industrial and gastronomy clients, which suggests a B2B and B2C hybrid model. The presence of a partner domain biotech-analytics.com indicates collaboration or service integration. The website content and structure reflect a focused business with clear service offerings and a small company size. No large-scale certifications or extensive contact details are provided, consistent with a small enterprise. The business appears stable with domain registration consistent with company founding date. Growth potential may be linked to expanding training services and hygiene solutions in Austria.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is implemented, disabling Google Analytics tracking until user acceptance, which aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy pages are present, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Regular updates and security monitoring are recommended to maintain security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures to increase user trust and compliance.
  3. Include explicit contact channels for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic SEO audits to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BIO-TECH Betriebshygiene GmbH
Description
BIO-TECH Betriebshygiene GmbH
Key services
Hygiene services for industrial companies, Hygiene services for gastronomy businesses, Training offerings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Autoptimize plugin, LazySizes (lazy loading images), FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (disabled until cookie consent)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets hygiene services for industrial and gastronomy sectors.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common optimization plugins.
  4. Has basic privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  7. No suspicious external domains or links.
  8. No advertising networks detected except Google Analytics with opt-out.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  10. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with PHP backend, utilizing Autoptimize for CSS/JS optimization and LazySizes for image lazy loading, contributing to moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses standard meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. No advanced frameworks detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the HTML content. The site shows no signs of technical debt or deprecated technologies but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for a small business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biotech.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biotech.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.