Skip to main content

Security report for bindwise.com

Bindwise · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bindwise is a specialized service offering Amazon sellers instant alerts and monitoring for critical marketplace events such as Buybox hijackers, ASIN suppressions, feedback issues, and price or listing changes. The website presents a professional and focused business model targeting Amazon marketplace sellers, positioning itself as a niche SaaS provider in the e-commerce sector. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including AngularJS and responsive design principles, ensuring a good user experience across devices. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain and lack of explicit contact or privacy policies limit the overall trust and compliance posture. Security measures such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers are not verifiable from the provided data, indicating room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the site is functional and business-oriented but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security compliance to strengthen its market credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bindwise.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bindwise operates in the e-commerce sector, specifically serving Amazon sellers with monitoring and alerting services that help protect seller listings and reputation. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, focusing on real-time notifications to mitigate marketplace risks. The target audience is Amazon sellers who require proactive management of their product listings and feedback. The company appears to be a small entity without publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is consistent and professionally branded, though it lacks detailed business information such as founding year or company registration details. No partnerships or certifications are evident, suggesting an independent operation. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently limited by the lack of visible security headers and absence of documented security policies or incident response contacts. HTTPS usage is assumed but not confirmed from the data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which are best practices for security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not present, limiting the ability to assess the organization's security maturity. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via external tools.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish terms of service and security incident response information including contact emails.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file for transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bindwise
Description
Instant Notifications of Buybox Hijackers, Product ASIN Suppressions, Bad Feedback, Price & Listing Changes, and MUCH More, to finally rest easy at night
Key services
Buybox hijacker notifications, Product ASIN suppression alerts, Feedback monitoring, Price and listing change alerts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, AngularJS (implied by ng-cloak usage), Roboto font, Google Fonts, Responsive design
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain; likely managed under threecolts.com domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  5. No social media links or security incident contacts detected.
  6. Website uses modern responsive design and AngularJS framework.
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  9. Content is focused on Amazon seller monitoring services with clear business purpose.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content safety rating is safe.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with AngularJS and responsive CSS, providing a good user experience on desktop and mobile devices. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of CSS and JavaScript usage, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA or semantic enhancements potentially missing. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user data collection. Technical debt is low but could be improved by updating AngularJS to a more current framework version and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bindwise.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bindwise.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.