Skip to main content

Security report for bilovickakrizovatka.cz

Obec Bílovice nad Svitavou · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bilovickakrizovatka.cz represents a regional one-day multi-genre music festival organized by the municipality of Bílovice nad Svitavou in the Czech Republic. It features a variety of musical acts including folk ensembles, rock bands, and local personalities, targeting music fans and the local community. The business model revolves around event organization, ticket sales, and partnerships with local and regional sponsors. The site content is well-structured and consistent with the festival's cultural and community focus. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for tracking. It is mobile responsive and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information, and performance is moderate. The site includes a cookie consent banner indicating some level of privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy or terms of service pages, which are compliance gaps. The WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate risk exposure. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and published policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance, implement security best practices, and improve transparency regarding domain registration. The site appears legitimate and safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bilovickakrizovatka.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as a small regional cultural event with a focus on music and community engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in its local roots and diverse musical programming. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales and sponsorships from a broad partner ecosystem including insurance, architecture, automotive, and beverage companies. The target customer segments are local families, music enthusiasts, and cultural event attendees. Growth indicators include a consistent annual event with increasing partner involvement. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, indicating strong local business relationships. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and improve compliance documentation to enhance trust and market reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. The absence of privacy and terms policies, lack of security headers, and missing WHOIS data are notable compliance and trust gaps. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from base href) and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to cookie consent but lacks full policy disclosure. Overall, the site would benefit from formalizing security policies, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with a valid SSL certificate.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Bílovice nad Svitavou
Description
Jednodenní multižánrový hudební festival Bílovická křižovatka pořádaný obcí Bílovice nad Svitavou s programem zahrnujícím folklorní soubory, rockové a popové kapely a moderátory.
Key services
hudební festival, prodej vstupenek, propagace kulturních akcí
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • cookie consent banner with explicit consent button

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional music festival site with clear event and partner information.
  2. No privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with explicit user consent mechanism.
  4. No contact email found; only phone number provided in footer.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  7. Use of common web technologies like jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; minimal data collection visible.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; family-friendly festival.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a standard technology stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI and responsiveness, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations beyond basic meta tags. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving technical SEO and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bilovickakrizovatka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bilovickakrizovatka.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.