Skip to main content

Security report for bilesuparadize.lv

Other · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bilesuparadize.lv is a Latvian-based online platform specializing in the distribution of tickets for cultural events including concerts, festivals, theatre, and opera. It positions itself as the largest ticket distributor in Latvia for these event types, targeting a general audience interested in cultural activities. The site uses modern web technologies such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary and responsive design approach. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of contact information in the provided content, suggests areas for improvement in transparency and user trust. Security posture appears limited with no detected security headers or explicit security policies, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bilesuparadize.lv

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the ticket distribution sector within the cultural and entertainment industry in Latvia. Its market position as the largest distributor in the country for concerts, festivals, theatre, and opera tickets suggests a strong local presence and significant market share. The business model revolves around online ticket sales, likely generating revenue through commissions or direct sales. The target customer segment includes event attendees and cultural enthusiasts in Latvia. The use of modern web frameworks supports scalability and user engagement. However, the lack of visible contact and compliance information may impact customer confidence and regulatory adherence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently limited based on the available data. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for protecting users against common web vulnerabilities. The site uses HTTPS, but SSL configuration details are unknown. No incident response or security policies are visible, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of WHOIS data further limits trust verification. Strengthening security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and enabling vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and consistent with business information to improve trust.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Lielākais pasākumu, koncertu, festivālu, teātru un operas izrāžu biļešu izplatītājs Latvijā!
Key services
event ticket distribution, concert tickets, festival tickets, theatre tickets, opera tickets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language targeting Latvian market.
  2. Business is a major ticket distributor for cultural events in Latvia.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or privacy/cookie policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  5. Modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js, Nuxt.js) used indicating contemporary web development practices.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, which support server-side rendering and improved SEO. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts indicating some optimization efforts. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tags and responsive design classes. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks visible analytics or marketing tracking scripts in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is contemporary but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bilesuparadize.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bilesuparadize.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.