Skip to main content

Security report for bigtithitomi.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bigtithitomi.com is an adult entertainment platform focused on Japanese model Hitomi Tanaka, offering subscription-based access to videos and photos. It operates under the umbrella of The Score Group, a known adult content network, which lends credibility to the business. The site includes age verification and legal compliance statements to ensure adherence to adult content regulations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 4 and JavaScript with lazy loading for images, providing a responsive and moderately performant user experience. However, there is no WHOIS data available for the domain, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigtithitomi.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche adult entertainment sector, targeting adult consumers interested in Japanese adult content. Its business model is subscription-based, leveraging a network of related adult sites under The Score Group. The site integrates affiliate programs and marketing partnerships to drive revenue. The lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS transparency is typical in adult entertainment but may affect trust for some users. The partnership ecosystem includes bigboobbundle.com and scorepass.com, which handle memberships and payments. The site shows consistent branding and a clear focus on its target audience, with legal compliance statements to mitigate regulatory risks.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication, and an age verification gate is implemented to restrict access to minors. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or security contact information is provided, and there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy compliance improvements, and a published vulnerability disclosure policy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Conduct a privacy compliance audit to ensure GDPR and other regulations are met.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Photos and Videos of japanese big tit sensation Hitomi Tanaka.
Key services
adult videos, adult photos, membership access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4, IntersectionObserver API, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Age verification gate

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment site focused on Japanese model Hitomi Tanaka.
  2. Contains age verification gate and legal compliance statements.
  3. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and responsive design.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  8. Powered by The Score Group, a known adult content network.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and JavaScript for lazy loading images, improving performance and user experience. The site uses external CDN resources for CSS and JS, which aids in load times. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with better ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. No CMS or backend technologies were explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigtithitomi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigtithitomi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.