Skip to main content

Security report for bibusbaltics.eu

BIBUS Baltics · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BIBUS Baltics is a regional subsidiary of BIBUS AG, specializing in supplying premium components and designing customized, high-performance systems for machinery and automotive industries. The company has a long-standing history since 1947 and positions itself as a trusted partner offering tailored solutions. The website reflects a professional B2B business model targeting industrial clients with a focus on quality and reliability. Technically, the website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, incorporating best practices for performance, SEO, and mobile responsiveness. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates good privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though the lack of WHOIS data for the subdomain slightly reduces domain trust. Strategic recommendations include publishing terms of service, security policies, and incident response information to enhance transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bibusbaltics.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BIBUS Baltics operates within the manufacturing and transportation sectors, providing components and system design services primarily for machinery and automotive industries. Their business model is focused on B2B relationships, leveraging the parent company BIBUS AG's reputation and resources. The company emphasizes customized solutions and premium product offerings, which likely supports a competitive advantage in quality and service. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a regional focus in Latvia and the Baltics. The partnership ecosystem includes major technology and advertising providers such as Google and Meta Platforms. Growth indicators include a well-maintained digital presence and integration of modern web technologies. However, direct contact information is limited to contact forms, which may impact lead generation efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness perception. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and providing clear channels for security incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BIBUS Baltics
Description
BIBUS Baltics provides premium components from renowned manufacturers and design customized, high-performance systems and assemblies tailored to the specific needs of the machinery and automotive industries.
Key services
Premium components supply, Customized system design, High-performance assemblies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Swiper.js
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional business website for BIBUS Baltics, a subsidiary of BIBUS AG
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  6. Modern tech stack with React and Next.js
  7. Good SEO and mobile optimization
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable architecture. It uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Swiper.js for interactive UI components. The site is optimized for mobile devices and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and images to improve load times. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bibusbaltics.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bibusbaltics.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.