Skip to main content

Security report for logi.bgi.lv

SIA BGI · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA BGI is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing and installation of window and door constructions, including aluminum, wooden, and PVC materials. Established in 1999, it serves both private customers and large industrial and government clients across Latvia, the Baltic States, and Europe. The company emphasizes quality and uses materials from reputable European suppliers such as Reynaers and Schuco. Their product portfolio includes windows, doors, office partitions, security shutters, and related constructions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google analytics tools. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and basic security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logi.bgi.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BGI holds a solid market position as a leading window and door fitting company in Riga with over two decades of experience. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialization in aluminum structures and partnerships with top European material suppliers. The business model focuses on manufacturing and installation services targeting both private and institutional customers. The company leverages multiple social media platforms for marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a diversified product range and presence in multiple European markets. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. The use of Google Consent Mode indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of dedicated security or incident response pages indicate gaps in security posture. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by privacy and cookie policies but not explicitly detailed. The company should enhance its security documentation and technical defenses to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures, including data retention and user rights information.
  5. Obtain and display relevant industry certifications or trust seals to improve credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA BGI
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA BGI
Description
BGI is a company operating since 1999 specializing in installation and production of aluminum, wooden, PVC windows and doors, office partitions, security shutters, and related constructions. They serve both private and large industrial/government clients in Latvia, Baltic States, and Europe.
Key services
Aluminum windows and doors installation, Wooden windows and doors, PVC windows and doors, Office partitions, Security shutters, Gazebos made of aluminum profile, Frameless glazing, Sliding windows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent mode for Google Analytics configured

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Company has a clear business focus and established market presence.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  6. Use of modern CMS and SEO tools indicates moderate digital maturity.
  7. Social media presence is active on multiple platforms.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, which provides responsive design and SEO optimization. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Ads for tracking and marketing. The site loads with moderate performance and includes accessibility features at a basic level. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logi.bgi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logi.bgi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.