Skip to main content

Security report for bezpiecznypowrot.pl

PZU · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bezpiecznypowrot.pl represents a Polish insurance product branded under PZU, specializing in mountain travel insurance. It targets active travelers and sports enthusiasts, offering annual coverage including rescue, medical treatment, and transport costs. The site is professionally designed using WordPress with the Avada theme and incorporates modern web technologies such as jQuery and Lottie animations. SEO practices are well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business history, indicating legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bezpiecznypowrot.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the insurance sector with a niche focus on mountain travel insurance in Poland. Leveraging the strong PZU brand, it targets a specialized audience of active travelers and sports participants. The business model is product-centric, offering annual insurance coverage online. The website reflects a medium to large enterprise level with professional branding and consistent content quality. The presence of external marketing and analytics tools indicates active digital marketing efforts. However, the lack of visible contact information and compliance documentation may limit customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses performance optimization tools like WP Rocket. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed, and no security.txt file is found. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies suggests gaps in GDPR compliance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PZU
Description
Pierwsze polskie ubezpieczenie górskie dla miłośników podróży. Działa przez rok, obejmuje koszty ratownictwa, leczenia, transportu do kraju.
Key services
Mountain insurance, Coverage for rescue costs, Medical treatment coverage, Transport to country coverage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.3.2, Avada Theme, jQuery 3.7.0, Lottie animations, Yoast SEO plugin, WP Rocket (performance optimization)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC
  • Use of performance and lazy loading scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Salesmanago
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Salesmanago
Marketing tools
Salesmanago
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed insurance product site for mountain travelers.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main page HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No incident response or security contact information found.
  7. External domains mostly related to common CDNs, analytics, and social media.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.3.2 using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich CMS platform. It uses jQuery 3.7.0 and Lottie animations for interactive UI elements. Performance optimizations are applied via WP Rocket, including lazy loading of scripts and fonts. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern font loading techniques. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical implementation is solid but could improve accessibility features and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bezpiecznypowrot.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bezpiecznypowrot.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.