Skip to main content

Security report for beynonsports.com

Beynon Sports · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beynon Sports is a well-established manufacturer and supplier of sports surfaces, specializing in track and field facilities across North America. The company has a strong market presence with a history dating back to 2002, serving prestigious athletic venues, educational institutions, and city parks. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, targeting sports facility managers and organizations seeking high-quality athletic surfaces. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and a robust cookie consent mechanism, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, Google reCAPTCHA integration, and no exposed sensitive data, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent and GDPR-aligned policies. Contact is primarily via web forms, with no direct email or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and trustworthy business representation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beynonsports.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Beynon Sports operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on sports surfaces and track & field facility construction. Their business model centers on product sales and service support, targeting educational institutions, sports organizations, and municipal clients. The company leverages a strong brand with consistent messaging and a comprehensive product catalog. Their market position is reinforced by a long domain age and visible trust signals such as cookie compliance and social media engagement. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled lead generation approach via contact forms. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent medium-sized enterprise. The company maintains a professional online presence with good SEO and mobile optimization, supporting growth and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms from bots. The cookie consent mechanism is detailed and GDPR compliant, providing users granular control over cookie categories. However, the absence of DNSSEC and missing explicit security headers like Content Security Policy and HSTS represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not published, which could limit transparency in case of security events. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide direct contact information for security incidents or data protection inquiries to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beynon Sports
Description
Beynon surfaces are found in North America's most prestigious track and field facilities, reputed collegiate campuses, high schools and city parks.
Key services
Track and field surfaces, Sports facility design and construction, Customer support and service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes Consent Management, Olark Live Chat, Flickity Carousel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
YouTube tracking cookies
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and user controls
  3. Use of Google Analytics and YouTube embeds with appropriate cookie disclosures
  4. No direct email or phone contact found; contact is via web form
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Social media presence on major platforms with official company pages
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with libraries such as Flickity for carousels and CookieYes for consent management. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS servers, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is fast with optimized images and video content. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. No common CMS like WordPress or Drupal was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary CMS. The technical infrastructure is robust, but the lack of DNSSEC and some security headers indicates room for technical security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beynonsports.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beynonsports.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.