Skip to main content

Security report for betx.bet

EVONA ELECTRONIC · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain betx.bet is registered to EVONA ELECTRONIC, a Slovak company established in 2016. The website is intended for gambling or betting services as indicated by the domain name and TLD. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a 404 Not Found error with no metadata, structured data, or business information available. The lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the business model, services, or market position. Technically, the site is hosted behind Cloudflare but does not present any Web Application Firewall challenges or security blocks. The SSL configuration is basic, and no security headers are detected. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact information or incident response details are available, reducing transparency and trust. From a security perspective, the site shows minimal security best practices and lacks critical protections such as DNSSEC and security headers. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate with no suspicious patterns, but the absence of website content and policies results in a low security posture score. The content safety rating is questionable due to the gambling nature of the domain, which is adult-only content. Overall, the website is currently non-functional and lacks essential security, privacy, and business credibility elements. Strategic recommendations include restoring website content, implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, improving SSL and security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betx.bet

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind betx.bet appears to be a small gambling or betting service operated by EVONA ELECTRONIC in Slovakia. The domain age suggests an established presence since 2016, but the lack of accessible website content limits insights into market positioning or revenue streams. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business likely targets adult gamblers but currently lacks visible digital assets or marketing tools. The absence of analytics or advertising scripts indicates minimal digital marketing activity. Growth indicators and competitive advantages cannot be assessed due to missing content.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. The absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and advanced SSL configurations exposes the site to potential risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No forms or user input fields are available, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which is a positive trust factor. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Restore accessible website content to provide business and service information.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels including security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration to achieve excellent security standards and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EVONA ELECTRONIC
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to HTTP 404 error.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or SEO elements present.
  3. No forms, contact info, or social media links found.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. Domain is registered to a Slovak company since 2016 with no privacy protection.
  6. Hosting via Cloudflare but no WAF challenge detected.
  7. Website likely intended for gambling/betting services based on domain and TLD.
  8. Security posture is minimal with no security headers or advanced SSL configuration.
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  10. Content safety rated questionable due to gambling association.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal 404 error page with no metadata, scripts, or structured data. Hosting is via Cloudflare nameservers, but no WAF challenge or security block is detected. The absence of CMS or frameworks suggests a barebones or unconfigured site. Performance is moderate due to minimal content but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. SEO optimization is lacking with no meta tags or Open Graph data. The technical debt is high due to missing essential web elements and security configurations. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving accessibility, and deploying a robust CMS or platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betx.bet. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betx.bet.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.