Skip to main content

Security report for better.pl

FIRMA DZIEWIARSKA BETTER · Manufacturing · Poland

Partial score · DNS & email only

20/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Better.pl is a Polish manufacturing company specializing in producing sweaters and apparel for uniformed services such as the military, police, prison services, security personnel, and fire brigades. Their product range includes cotton scarves, promotional scarves, reflective vests, and T-shirts, targeting a niche market of uniform apparel. The company has been operational since 2010, supported by consistent domain registration data. The website presents a professional and clear business focus with good content quality and user experience, though it lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Scanned

6 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high in the checks that completed. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching better.pl

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Network security
20
Average
20

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on uniform apparel for various public and security services. Their business model appears to be direct manufacturing and sales, targeting institutional clients. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains a straightforward product offering with a clear target audience, but lacks visible certifications or trust badges that could enhance credibility further.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and is hosted by cyber_Folks S.A., but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and there is no indication of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these security best practices reduces the overall security posture score. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected, but improvements are needed to align with modern security standards and GDPR compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance to better understand user behavior and improve marketing efforts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FIRMA DZIEWIARSKA BETTER
Description
Specializes in manufacturing sweaters for uniformed services including military, police, prison services, security personnel, and fire brigades. Also produces cotton scarves, promotional items, reflective vests, and T-shirts.
Key services
Production of sweaters for uniformed services, Cotton scarves, Promotional scarves, Reflective vests, T-shirts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and an email address.
  4. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard web technologies.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking services detected.
  7. Content is relevant and professional, targeting uniformed services sector.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Google Maps API is used for location display. The site is hosted by cyber_Folks S.A. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations and modern analytics integrations, indicating room for modernization and technical improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with better.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review better.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.