Skip to main content

Security report for betonform.lv

Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Betonform.lv is a Latvian small manufacturing business specializing in concrete paving products such as bricks, curbs, steps, and fence posts. Established since 2005, the company offers certified products compliant with EU standards and provides delivery and unloading services. The website is primarily in Latvian with options for English and Russian, targeting local customers seeking quality concrete paving solutions. Technically, the site uses older web technologies including Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 1.11, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features, and no contact information or privacy policies are present. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a basic but functional online presence for a small local manufacturer.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betonform.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention betonform.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for betonform.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focused on concrete paving products, serving the Latvian market. Its business model centers on production and local distribution with an emphasis on product certification and quality. The website content and product offerings suggest a stable, established business with a niche market. However, the lack of detailed contact information and privacy policies online may limit customer trust and compliance with data protection regulations. The use of Zyro website builder indicates a cost-effective digital presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security posture with no visible security headers and no evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11 may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, updated libraries, and clear privacy and cookie policies to improve security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Include clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Update JavaScript libraries and frameworks to supported, secure versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Uzņēmums ar bruģa ražošanu nodarbojas kopš 2005.gada. Produkcija ir sertificēta un atbilst visiem ES standartiem un ekspluatācijas īpašībām. Piedāvā bruģi dažādās formās un krāsās, pakāpienus, apmales, sētas stabus un citus betona izstrādājumus ar piegādi un izkraušanu.
Key services
Concrete paving production, Delivery and unloading of large and heavy goods, Manufacture of steps, curbs, fence posts, and other concrete products
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.x, jQuery 1.11.3, Google Analytics, Font Awesome 4.7.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian with language selector for English and Russian
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. Social media links to Twitter and Facebook present but no company-specific accounts identified
  5. Uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap, which may have security implications
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking
  7. No forms detected on the main page
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) or schema.org markup found
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. No SSL/TLS configuration details provided; HTTPS usage assumed from base href but not confirmed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 1.11.3, which are outdated and may pose security risks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking. The site is built on the Zyro platform, which provides basic hosting and site building capabilities. The HTML structure is valid but minimal in SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic with a fixed viewport width of 768px. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern technologies and optimization. No structured data or schema markup is present to enhance search engine understanding.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betonform.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betonform.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.