Skip to main content

Security report for betonam.lv

BETONAM · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BETONAM is a Latvian company specializing in construction-related services including concrete formwork rental, waterproofing repair, and material sales. The website targets construction professionals and customers within Latvia, offering a range of services and products relevant to the construction industry. The business appears to be a small-sized local player founded around 2016, with a focus on B2B and B2C markets. The site branding is moderately consistent with a clear logo and service offerings, though the slogan is missing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with reCAPTCHA for form security. However, some security best practices like HTTP security headers are not detected, and privacy policy documentation is absent. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic good practices including HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is moderately secure but could improve compliance and security posture. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to implement security headers, add privacy and security policies, and maintain up-to-date software. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betonam.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BETONAM operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors focused on construction materials and services in Latvia. The company leverages an e-commerce platform to sell materials and rents formwork equipment, indicating a hybrid business model combining product sales and service rentals. The presence of training and job vacancy pages suggests a growing or stable business with workforce development. Marketing efforts include social media presence and digital analytics, supporting customer engagement and market reach. The company targets construction professionals and local customers, positioning itself as a specialized regional provider. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The business model is straightforward with revenue streams from rentals, sales, and training services. The website content and structure support a professional image but lack comprehensive legal and security documentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions and data submissions. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site uses popular and regularly updated plugins and themes, but no vulnerability scanning results are available. No sensitive data exposure or insecure forms were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and vulnerability scans, especially for WooCommerce components.
  5. Enhance GDPR compliance by integrating detailed cookie and data processing disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BETONAM
Description
Jāizdomā sauklis
Key services
Veidņu noma (Formwork rental), Hidroizolācijas remonts (Waterproofing repair), Materiālu Tirdzniecība (Material sales), Apmācības (Training), Vakances (Job vacancies)
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, jQuery
Frameworks
Flatsome WordPress Theme, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce and informational site for a Latvian construction materials and services company.
  2. Uses standard SEO and marketing tools including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel.
  3. Cookie consent banner present indicating some GDPR compliance effort.
  4. Contact information including email, phone, physical address, and contact forms are present and clearly labeled.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site content fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Flatsome theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. The site uses reCAPTCHA for form protection and includes a cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with prefetching and asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed privacy documentation, which are technical debt areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betonam.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betonam.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.