Skip to main content

Security report for bethere.be

Bethere · Other · Belgium

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bethere is a small communication and digital services company based in Waregem, Belgium, founded in 2006. The company specializes in branding, website and webshop design, and marketing services targeted primarily at local businesses and organizations. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on clear communication and client references. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile optimized and provides a user-friendly experience with clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and spam protection on forms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bethere.be

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
35
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bethere operates as a specialized communication and digital services provider with a strong local presence in Waregem. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored branding, website, and webshop solutions, supported by marketing consulting. The company leverages client testimonials and references to build trust and market positioning. Their use of WordPress and popular plugins indicates a cost-effective and scalable approach. The target audience includes small to medium local businesses seeking professional communication services. The company has maintained consistent branding and content quality since its founding in 2006, indicating stable operations and market relevance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect its contact forms from spam and abuse. However, no explicit security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness. The contact form includes a GDPR-compliant consent checkbox, supporting data protection compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet broader compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider documenting data retention policies and improving privacy compliance disclosures to align with GDPR best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bethere
Description
bethere, cutting edge communicatie in Waregem zorgt voor scherpe communicatie zowel online als offline!
Key services
Ontwerp & ontwikkeling websites, Ontwerp & ontwikkeling webshops, Ontwerp van uw huisstijl, Marketing and communication consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Lightbox, Contact Form 7 (WordPress plugin)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Consent checkbox on contact form for data processing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based communication and digital services provider
  2. Content is in Dutch and targeted at local/regional businesses
  3. Contact form includes GDPR consent checkbox
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for tracking and spam prevention
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is long-standing and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior. The contact form is powered by Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam prevention. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations, and mobile responsiveness is good. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bethere.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bethere.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.