Skip to main content

Security report for betfunda.lv

SIA BETFUNDA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA BETFUNDA is a Latvian small business specializing in industrial and epoxy concrete flooring services, including installation, renovation, and marking of floors in industrial, food processing, medical, pharmaceutical, and automotive sectors. Founded in 2004, the company operates primarily in the Baltic region and maintains partnerships with several construction material suppliers. The website reflects a basic but functional digital presence built on an outdated WordPress platform with limited modern features. While the site includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is weakened by outdated software and absence of security headers, exposing potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the business appears legitimate and regionally focused but would benefit from technical and security modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betfunda.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets industrial clients requiring specialized flooring solutions, leveraging experience since 2004. Its business model is service-oriented with a focus on construction and renovation of industrial floors. Partnerships with known suppliers like maxit.lv and indutek.lv suggest a stable supply chain and industry integration. The website content is relevant and targeted but lacks comprehensive contact details and compliance documentation, which may limit customer confidence. Growth potential exists through digital modernization and enhanced online presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The use of HTTPS is implied but not confirmed with security headers. The website runs on an outdated WordPress version (2.9.2) and old jQuery (1.3.2), which are known to have vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response or security contact information is available. The absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options increases risk exposure. The site collects user data via Google Analytics and Tag Manager without visible consent mechanisms, raising GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture requires urgent improvements to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade WordPress and all plugins to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Conduct a security audit and implement an incident response plan with published contact channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA BETFUNDA
Description
Uzņēmums nodarbojas ar rūpniecisko betona grīdu izveidi, vecu betona grīdu renovāciju, ražošanas telpu un noliktavu betona grīdu marķēšanu, rūpniecisko ražošanas telpu sienu apdari – krāsošanu, ārsienu siltināšanu. Galvenās specializācijas ir rūpnieciskas betona grīdas, epoksīda grīdas, betona grīdu apstrāde un atjaunošana. Darbi tiek veikti visā Baltijas teritorijā.
Key services
Industrial concrete floor installation, Concrete floor renovation, Floor marking for production and warehouse spaces, Industrial wall finishing and insulation, Polymer material application, Concrete protection, milling, grinding
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 2.9.2, jQuery 1.3.2, SWFObject 2.1, Contact Form 7 plugin, NextGEN Gallery plugin, Flexible Lightbox plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS used (implied by https URLs for scripts and favicon)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some language switch options
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  4. Contact information limited to a search form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found
  5. Outdated CMS and libraries present security risks
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no visible cookie consent
  7. Partner logos indicate established business relationships
  8. No social media links detected
  9. No security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an outdated WordPress 2.9.2 CMS with legacy jQuery 1.3.2 and SWFObject 2.1, indicating technical debt and potential security risks. It uses common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and NextGEN Gallery, but versions are old. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS over HTTPS, but some resources use HTTP, which may cause mixed content issues. The design is basic with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern frameworks and optimization. Hosting provider details are not available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betfunda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betfunda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.