Skip to main content

Security report for bet.pt

Gobet Entretenimento, S.A · Other · Portugal

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bwin Portugal, operated by Gobet Entretenimento, S.A and part of the Entain group, is a prominent online sports betting and casino platform targeting the Portuguese market. The website offers a wide range of betting options including football, tennis, basketball, and live betting, alongside a comprehensive online casino with slots, roulette, and blackjack. The platform is well-positioned in the Portuguese online gambling sector with a strong brand presence and legal compliance. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Angular and Partytown for script optimization, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience across devices. The integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools is balanced with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature approach to privacy and user data management. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Overall, bwin.pt demonstrates a professional, secure, and user-friendly online gambling service with strong business credibility and digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bet.pt

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bet.pt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
30,184
Employees
2
Customers
30,150
Third parties
32
Weak passwords
30%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 33 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bet.pt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –bohub.bet.pt2025-07-20
  • –bohub.bet.pt2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bwin.pt operates in the competitive online gambling market in Portugal, leveraging the backing of Entain, a global leader in betting and gaming. The business model focuses on sports betting and casino gaming, targeting Portuguese-speaking customers with localized content and legal compliance. The platform benefits from a broad service offering, including live betting and a variety of casino games, enhancing customer engagement and retention. Partnerships and integrations with major ad networks and analytics providers support effective marketing and user acquisition strategies. The company’s market position is reinforced by its legal licensing and parent company reputation, providing trust and reliability to users. Growth potential is supported by digital innovation and adherence to regulatory frameworks.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of cookie consent tools, and modern script management to reduce attack surface. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The site’s security headers appear to be partially implemented, and a recommendation is made to verify and enhance these headers for defense in depth. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from explicit documentation and communication of security practices to users and stakeholders.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Ensure comprehensive implementation of security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies in line with evolving GDPR and local regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gobet Entretenimento, S.A
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gobet Entretenimento, S.A
Description
Descubra a bwin Portugal, a sua casa de apostas online com milhares de opções em futebol, ténis, basquetebol e mais. No casino online da bwin temos slot machines, roleta, blackjack e muito mais jogos de casino. Aproveita o nosso bónus de boas-vindas e diverte-te.
Key services
Sports betting, Live betting, Online casino games, Slot machines, Roulette, Blackjack
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular (ng-version=19.2.7), Partytown for script offloading, Google Tag Manager, LaunchDarkly, OneTrust cookie consent, CSS custom properties, Fonts: Roboto, Roboto Condensed, Druk Wide LCG Web
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • Use of Partytown to offload third-party scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, LaunchDarkly
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick, Bing Ads, Adform, Amazon Ads, TikTok Analytics, StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, TikTok Analytics, Adform Trackpoint
Marketing tools
LaunchDarkly, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found.
  5. Good integration of analytics and marketing tools with privacy considerations.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on Angular 19.2.7, indicating a modern front-end framework usage. Partytown is employed to offload third-party scripts, improving performance and security. The presence of Google Tag Manager, LaunchDarkly, and OneTrust indicates sophisticated analytics, feature flagging, and consent management. Fonts are optimized with WOFF2 and preloading strategies. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and media queries. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and SEO. Hosting details are not explicit but likely use CDN and cloud infrastructure. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and maintainable online gambling platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bet.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bet.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.