Skip to main content

Security report for bestshow.lv

www.bestshow.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bestshow.lv represents an international choreographers competition primarily targeting dance professionals and enthusiasts. The site provides event information, results, galleries, regulations, and registration details, positioning itself as a regional event organizer in Latvia. The business model revolves around event management and promotion within the dance community. The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and includes multimedia galleries and social media integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies such as PHP, jQuery, and Google Fonts, with SEO optimization via Yoast SEO. While HTTPS is properly configured, some security best practices like security headers are missing. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, suggesting incomplete analytics implementation. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure, contributing to a good user experience. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, indicating room for improvement in security posture and transparency. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, bestshow.lv is a professionally presented event website with good content quality and business credibility but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and analytics configuration to improve its security and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bestshow.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bestshow.lv operates as a niche event organizer focusing on international choreographers competitions, serving a specialized market segment within the performing arts and dance industry. Its competitive advantage lies in its established event presence since 2018, supported by multimedia galleries and social media engagement. The business model is event-centric, likely generating revenue through registrations and sponsorships. The target audience includes dance professionals, choreographers, and enthusiasts primarily in Latvia and neighboring regions. The website's content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a focused operational scope. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth indicators include active event updates and social media activity, though broader market expansion or diversification is not apparent.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The lack of configured analytics and missing privacy and cookie policies highlight compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could delay mitigation in case of security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires focused improvements in headers, policies, and transparency to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Properly configure Google Analytics or remove unused tracking plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection and potential privacy issues.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update website plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated or vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
www.bestshow.lv
Description
INTERNATIONAL CHOREOGRAPHERS COMPETITION
Key services
International choreographers competition, Event results publication, Gallery showcasing, Regulations and registration information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO plugin, LayerSlider
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based event site for an international choreographers competition.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English elements.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  5. Contact available via a dedicated contact page with a form.
  6. Social media presence on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
  9. No advanced security headers detected.
  10. Google Analytics plugin installed but not configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5 with the Enfold theme version 5.6.12, utilizing common web technologies including PHP and jQuery. It leverages Google Fonts and LayerSlider for enhanced visual presentation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO practices via Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating incomplete analytics setup. The absence of security headers and minimal accessibility features suggest technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for small event websites but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bestshow.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bestshow.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.