Skip to main content

Security report for bestattungen-dietrich.de

Bestattungsunternehmen Dietrich · Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bestattungen Dietrich is a small, local funeral service provider based in Frohburg and Geithain, Germany. The company offers a range of funeral services including earth burial, cremation, sea burial, and forest burial, focusing on providing compassionate support to clients during bereavement. The website content is primarily in German and targets local individuals and families in need of funeral arrangements. The business operates with a straightforward model emphasizing personalized service and local presence. Technically, the website is built using SIQUANDO Web 10 CMS with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript including jQuery. The site includes basic multimedia content such as a video presentation. However, the technical implementation is somewhat dated, using ISO-8859-1 charset and lacking modern SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring trust. No forms or sensitive data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance features indicates gaps in GDPR adherence. The WHOIS data shows a valid domain with active nameservers but lacks detailed registrant information, which is typical for small local businesses but limits full trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and provides relevant business information but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trustworthiness and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bestattungen-dietrich.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bestattungen Dietrich operates as a small funeral service provider in a niche local market in Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized, compassionate service and local accessibility with physical offices in Frohburg and Geithain. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagement rather than digital sales or marketing. Revenue streams are likely from funeral service fees and related arrangements. The company does not appear to have a broad partnership ecosystem or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are not evident from the website. The lack of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggests a traditional business approach focused on local reputation.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic and presents several concerns. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential data interception and reduces trust. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. The lack of cookie consent and GDPR compliance features suggests regulatory risk. However, the site does not collect sensitive data via forms, mitigating some risk. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the business should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to protect clients and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS redirects site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Modernize technical stack including charset to UTF-8 and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bestattungsunternehmen Dietrich
Description
Bestattungen Dietrich is a funeral service provider located in Frohburg and Geithain, Germany. They offer assistance in cases of bereavement, helping clients to arrange dignified funerals including earth burials, cremations, sea burials, and forest burials.
Key services
Erdbestattung (earth burial), Feuerbestattung (cremation), Seebestattung (sea burial), Waldbestattung (forest burial), Funeral planning and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is not blocked.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. No forms present on the homepage or contact pages in provided HTML.
  4. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. Phone numbers and physical addresses are clearly provided.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  8. Website uses an older meta charset ISO-8859-1 instead of UTF-8.
  9. JavaScript includes jQuery and custom animation scripts.
  10. No Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses SIQUANDO Web 10 CMS with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript including jQuery. The charset is ISO-8859-1, which is outdated compared to UTF-8. The site includes multiple CSS files and a custom script for UI animations. No modern frameworks or platforms detected. Hosting appears to be with rzone.de based on nameservers. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization features. Mobile optimization is basic with a smartphone redirect script but no responsive design evident. SEO is basic with meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. Technical debt includes outdated charset, lack of HTTPS, and missing security headers, which pose risks to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bestattungen-dietrich.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bestattungen-dietrich.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.