Skip to main content

Security report for besip.cz

BESIP · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BESIP is the primary governmental entity responsible for coordinating road safety efforts in the Czech Republic. It operates as an expert body under the Ministry of Transport, focusing on education, awareness campaigns, and safety strategies for various road users including pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and motorcyclists. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for road safety information, educational materials, and campaign updates, targeting a broad audience from the general public to professionals in the field. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with integration of modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js. It employs Kentico CMS for content management and includes features like Google Maps integration and social sharing tools. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some legacy technology components remain. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF protection tokens in forms. It implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration transparency, but the official government domain and consistent branding support legitimacy. Overall, BESIP's website is a well-structured, authoritative platform for road safety in the Czech Republic, with a solid technical foundation and good privacy compliance. Enhancements in security headers and public security policies would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching besip.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention besip.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for besip.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BESIP holds a strong market position as the Czech Republic's official road safety authority, backed by the Ministry of Transport. Its business model centers on public service and education, delivering campaigns, training, and statistical insights to improve traffic safety nationwide. The organization collaborates with various governmental and non-governmental partners, evident from linked domains and campaign references. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on diverse user groups, including children, seniors, and professional stakeholders, reflecting a comprehensive approach to road safety education. The presence of social media channels and regular updates suggests active engagement and outreach efforts. Revenue streams are likely government-funded, with no commercial activities apparent. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding digital education tools and enhancing interactive content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and CSRF tokens are implemented in forms, indicating awareness of common web security practices. The cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR compliance, reflecting attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact channels for reporting security incidents or vulnerabilities, such as a dedicated security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to ensure no known vulnerabilities are present.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BESIP
Description
BESIP is the main coordinating body for road safety in the Czech Republic, an expert authority focusing on human factors in traffic safety, operating as an independent department of the Ministry of Transport of the Czech Republic.
Key services
Road safety coordination, Public education and awareness campaigns, Traffic safety statistics and research, Educational materials and training, Support for drivers, cyclists, pedestrians, and other road users
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Bootstrap 4 and 5, Swiper.js, Google Maps API, ShareThis, Moment.js, Simple Lightbox
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Meta Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel (Facebook Pixel)
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government portal focused on road safety in the Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple sections for different road user groups.
  3. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to registry policy or privacy.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact page exists but not included in provided data.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks with some legacy ASP.NET WebForms technology.
  8. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content.
  9. Social media presence on official platforms enhances trust.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform integrated with modern front-end libraries like jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, providing responsive design and interactive features. Kentico CMS is used for content management, facilitating structured content delivery. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing legacy components and scripts. The site includes Google Maps API for location services and ShareThis for social sharing, enhancing user engagement. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented through meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is present due to legacy ASP.NET WebForms usage, suggesting opportunities for modernization to improve maintainability and performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's functional and content needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with besip.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review besip.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.