AMS (Arbeitsmarktservice Österreich) · Government · Austria
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.
The AMS Berufslexikon website is an official Austrian government career information portal operated by the Arbeitsmarktservice Österreich (AMS). It provides comprehensive information on over 1,800 professions, including job descriptions, educational requirements, career prospects, and salary data. The platform targets job seekers, students, and career advisors within Austria, offering advanced search and filtering capabilities to facilitate career exploration. The site is well-branded with AMS logos and consistent government styling, reinforcing its authoritative position in the Austrian labor market information ecosystem. Technically, the website employs a modern and mature technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Matomo analytics. It is mobile-optimized, accessible, and features a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR standards. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility practices. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring secure data transmission. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for a government-related domain. Overall, the AMS Berufslexikon website is a trustworthy, professional, and secure platform providing valuable career information to the Austrian public. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing explicit incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
DMARC provides email authentication and reporting
What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate expires in 29 days
What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention berufslexikon.at, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for berufslexikon.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with berufslexikon.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review berufslexikon.at.