Skip to main content

Security report for bernu-sports.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bernu-sports.lv is currently inaccessible to normal visitors due to a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page that blocks direct access. This page is designed to prevent automated bot traffic and cyber attacks but results in no visible business content or services. The site uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated in meta tags, which are unsupported and pose security risks. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business information is available on the page. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site demonstrates a basic security posture with bot protection but lacks transparency, modern technology, and compliance indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bernu-sports.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the CAPTCHA block, no business information, contact details, or company branding is accessible. The site appears to be a small-scale operation or possibly under maintenance/security review. There is no evidence of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The presence of multiple CMS meta tags suggests legacy or misconfigured CMS usage. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and absence of contact information negatively impact business credibility and user trust.

Security posture

The security posture is partially mature with the implementation of BitNinja's CAPTCHA and Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. However, the use of outdated CMS versions and absence of visible security headers or HTTPS information are significant concerns. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators and does not provide privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security measures are minimal and focused solely on bot mitigation without comprehensive security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Upgrade CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal requirements and build user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  5. Provide accessible contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website is presenting a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website is currently displaying a security CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitors are not automated bots. No business description or services are presented.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully blocked by a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is accessible on the page.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits.
  4. Website uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) indicated in meta tags, which are unsupported and vulnerable.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present, indicating tracking but no privacy policy found.
  6. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  7. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS information available in provided data.
  9. Website is not accessible for normal users without passing CAPTCHA.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are outdated and unsupported, posing security and compatibility risks. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking capabilities, but no privacy compliance is evident. The site employs Google reCAPTCHA and BitNinja CAPTCHA for bot protection. The HTML and CSS appear valid but minimal, with basic mobile optimization. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. Performance and hosting details are unknown due to content blocking. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features beyond basic levels.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bernu-sports.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bernu-sports.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.