Skip to main content

Security report for bergsportrecht.eu

Wijnkamp Stachowitz Rechtsanwälte GmbH · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wijnkamp Stachowitz Rechtsanwälte GmbH is a Dutch-speaking law firm based in Austria specializing in legal assistance related to skiing and mountain sports accidents, vacation home issues, international commercial law, medical liability, and international criminal law. The firm targets Dutch-speaking clients requiring legal support in Austria, offering multilingual communication and emergency contact services. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several plugins to support multilingual content and GDPR compliance. It features professional design, clear navigation, and accessible contact information, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates a trustworthy and professional legal service provider with room for enhanced security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bergsportrecht.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm occupies a niche market serving Dutch-speaking clients in Austria, focusing on specialized legal areas such as ski accidents and international law. Its business model revolves around providing expert legal advice and representation. The website's multilingual capabilities and clear contact channels suggest a client-centric approach. The presence of social media links and GDPR compliance indicates awareness of modern digital marketing and privacy standards. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent small-sized firm. The partnership with a web design company (Sixfish Media) is noted. The firm’s market position is that of a specialized boutique law firm with a clear regional and linguistic focus.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR, indicating good baseline security and privacy practices. However, no advanced security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of reputable plugins reduce risk. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wijnkamp Stachowitz Rechtsanwälte GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wijnkamp Stachowitz Rechtsanwälte GmbH
Description
Nederlandstalig advocatenkantoor gevestigd in Oostenrijk, gespecialiseerd in skiongevallen, letselschade, vakantiehuizen problematiek, internationaal handelsrecht, medisch aansprakelijkheidsrecht en internationaal strafrecht.
Key services
Ski- en bergsportongevallen in Oostenrijk, Vakantiehuizen problematiek, Internationaal handelsrecht, Medisch aansprakelijkheidsrecht, Internationaal strafrecht
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Easy Video Player, Complianz GDPR plugin, Multilanguage Pro plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional law firm site with multilingual support.
  2. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
  5. Uses modern WordPress plugins and Elementor for design.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Vimeo.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging plugins for multilingual support and GDPR compliance. It uses jQuery and Easy Video Player for interactive content. The site loads external resources from trusted domains and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The technical implementation is modern and follows best practices for SEO and user experience. Some technical debt may exist due to reliance on multiple plugins, but no critical issues were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bergsportrecht.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bergsportrecht.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.