Skip to main content

Security report for bergholt.net

Kasper Bergholt · Other · Denmark

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kasper Bergholt's website serves as a digital portfolio and informational platform showcasing his art and photography projects, primarily focused on cultural and artistic themes rooted in Copenhagen, Denmark. The site targets art enthusiasts and the general public interested in contemporary Danish art and photography. The business model is that of an individual artist's portfolio and informational site without direct e-commerce or transactional features. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Matomo analytics configured for privacy-conscious tracking and a lightbox gallery plugin. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is enforced, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookies & privacy page but no explicit consent mechanism or GDPR compliance statements. No direct contact information or incident response policies are provided, which limits business credibility and user trust. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bergholt.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bergholt.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bergholt.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bergholt.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Kasper Bergholt as a niche artist and photographer with a focus on exhibitions and artistic projects. The long domain age supports a stable online presence. The site lacks commercial features and direct contact channels, suggesting a focus on brand building and portfolio presentation rather than direct sales. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The content is consistent and professionally presented, targeting a general audience interested in art and culture. The absence of social media links or marketing tools indicates a low reliance on external promotion channels. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the site as a personal portfolio.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and disables cookies in Matomo analytics, reflecting a privacy-aware approach. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is available, which is a gap in preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. Overall, security is adequate for a portfolio site but could be improved to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a comprehensive privacy policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements and a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Publish incident response and security policy information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding verified contact information or a secure contact form to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kasper Bergholt
Description
Copenhagen Art & Photography: Objects for an Ideal Home ~ Flora Excursoria Hafniensis ~ The Time Is Ouf of Joint
Key services
art exhibitions, photography portfolio, artistic projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Matomo Analytics, BaguetteBox Lightbox, All in One SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client Transfer Prohibited domain status
  • No cookies tracking (Matomo configured to disable cookies)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an artist portfolio and informational site focused on art and photography.
  2. Content is well structured with multiple articles and projects.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond a basic cookies & privacy page.
  5. No terms of service or incident response information available.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern theme and plugins including Matomo for analytics and BaguetteBox for image galleries. The HTML is valid and SEO optimized with structured data (JSON-LD) for breadcrumbs, person, and website schema enhancing search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present with skip links and screen reader text. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the registrar is joker.com. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small artist portfolio but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High34 findingsView report
  2. 49/100High34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bergholt.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bergholt.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.