Skip to main content

Security report for belyaev.lv

Belyaev & Belyaev Law Firm · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Belyaev & Belyaev Law Firm is a professional legal services provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in litigation, corporate law, and tax law. The firm targets both private individuals and business entities, positioning itself as a full-service law firm with notable achievements such as favorable Supreme Court rulings and advisory roles for the European Commission. The website reflects a small-sized, focused legal practice with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. Hosting is provided via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring reliable performance and moderate loading speeds. The site is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features and good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers and a formal security policy or incident response contact are absent, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for the law firm, though the lack of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure process to strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching belyaev.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal sector, focusing on litigation, corporate, and tax law services primarily within Latvia. Its market positioning is supported by documented court successes and advisory roles, indicating a reputable standing in the local legal market. The business model is service-oriented, targeting both individuals and corporate clients. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized firm with a clear focus on quality legal services rather than volume. The firm maintains a professional digital presence with consistent branding and relevant content, supporting client trust and engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and integrates with Google Consent Mode, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional service website but could be improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Belyaev & Belyaev Law Firm
Description
Belyaev & Belyaev is a full-service law firm based in Riga, Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of legal services custom-tailored for the needs of either private individuals or business entities.
Key services
Litigation, Corporate Law, Tax Law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Webflow
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Google Consent Mode integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-953614083)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls implemented.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of purchase pages present and accessible.
  5. Contact information includes physical address and phone number clearly displayed.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. Uses modern web technologies and hosted on a reputable CDN.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities observed in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google services for analytics and tag management. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, providing reliable content delivery. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security and integrates Google Consent Mode for privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site lacks some advanced security headers which could be added to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with belyaev.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review belyaev.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.