Skip to main content

Security report for belmot.de

Mannheimer Versicherung AG · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BELMOT is a specialized insurance brand under Mannheimer Versicherung AG, focusing on classic vehicle insurance for Oldtimers and Youngtimers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting classic car enthusiasts and owners. It offers key insurance services such as all-risk coverage and value appreciation protection. The site is built on a modern technical stack including Liferay DXP and React, with integration of Usercentrics for consent management and Piwik Pro for analytics. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and content relevant to its niche audience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and a Content Security Policy, but explicit security and incident response policies are not published. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency around security policies and WHOIS data clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching belmot.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention belmot.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for belmot.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BELMOT operates in the niche insurance sector for classic vehicles, leveraging the reputation of Mannheimer Versicherung AG. Its business model centers on providing tailored insurance products for classic car owners, emphasizing risk coverage and value protection. The company maintains active engagement through social media and content marketing (podcasts, magazine). The partnership with Mannheimer Versicherung AG strengthens its market position. The website's content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focused target audience. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled contact via forms, possibly to manage lead quality. The use of modern web technologies and consent management tools reflects a commitment to digital maturity and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a robust Content Security Policy, reducing risks of common web attacks. The integration of Usercentrics CMP ensures compliance with cookie consent regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data is minimal and domain status is unusual, which slightly reduces trust. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which are recommended best practices. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information and improving WHOIS transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Improve WHOIS data transparency or domain registration details to enhance trust.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mannheimer Versicherung AG
Description
Die Versicherung für Oldtimer, Youngtimer und Liebhaberfahrzeuge mit Allgefahrendeckung, Wertsteigerungsvorsorge und Versicherung zum Wiederbeschaffungswert.
Key services
Oldtimerversicherung, Youngtimerversicherung, Allgefahrendeckung, Wertsteigerungsvorsorge
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Liferay DXP, React, jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, Usercentrics CMP, PrimeFaces
Frameworks
Liferay, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Consent management platform used
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and focused on classic vehicle insurance.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and consent management.
  3. No signs of malware or phishing.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or credentials found.
  6. Social media integration present with active Facebook and Instagram links.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Contact information primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  9. Good privacy and cookie compliance with Usercentrics CMP.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Liferay DXP CMS with React and jQuery for frontend interactivity, supported by Bootstrap and Swiper for UI components and sliders. Usercentrics CMP is used for consent management, and Piwik Pro handles analytics. The site uses a Content Security Policy and loads resources over HTTPS, indicating good security hygiene. Performance is moderate with combined and minified resources. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, but some legacy scripts (jQuery) remain. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence with opportunities for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with belmot.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review belmot.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.