Skip to main content

Security report for beju-hh.de

PATE Hamburg · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PATE Hamburg operates a specialized web platform designed to systematically capture offerings, participants, and outcomes for selected social programs managed by the Hamburg Social Authority. The platform supports programs such as Jugendhilfe reporting and ESF+ participant tracking, serving a niche government and social services audience. The business model centers on providing a digital tool for data management and reporting within public social programs, positioning itself as a trusted service for Hamburg's social sector. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator combined with Bootstrap for responsive design, hosted on Hetzner infrastructure. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, with a clean and consistent branding approach. However, there is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility features, as well as the implementation of security headers. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and uses integrity attributes on scripts and stylesheets, indicating attention to content security. Nonetheless, the absence of explicit security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests moderate security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the domain registration aligns well with the platform's public service nature. Overall, the platform presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for Hamburg's social programs, with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance, security posture, and user contact accessibility to further strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beju-hh.de

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention beju-hh.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for beju-hh.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets government and non-profit sectors, specifically social welfare programs in Hamburg. Its competitive advantage lies in its tailored functionality for Hamburg's social authority programs, likely limiting competition due to its specialized scope. Revenue streams are presumably public funding or internal government budgets rather than commercial sales. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains such as av.beju-hh.de and doku.beju-hh.de, which appear to be complementary service or documentation sites. Growth indicators are not explicit but the addition of new program support in 2024 suggests ongoing development. Strategic observations include the need to improve user engagement channels and compliance transparency to support broader adoption and trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, and script integrity checks are in place, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Compliance with GDPR is partially evidenced by the privacy policy, but cookie consent is missing. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not visible, which could delay response to security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public information platform but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information availability on the website to improve user trust and support accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PATE Hamburg
Description
Die Plattform PATE dient der systematischen Erfassung von Angeboten, Teilnehmenden und Ergebnissen für ausgewählte Programme der Sozialbehörde Hamburg. Sie unterstützt Programme wie Berichtswesen Jugendhilfe und Teilnehmenden-Erfassung ESF+. Die Angebotsverwaltung erfolgt über eine separate Plattform.
Key services
Berichtswesen Jugendhilfe, Teilnehmenden-Erfassung ESF+, Angebotsverwaltung, Support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, Bootstrap, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of integrity and crossorigin attributes on scripts and stylesheets

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public service platform for Hamburg social programs.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage.
  6. No social media links found.
  7. Uses Hugo static site generator and Bootstrap framework.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern static site generator (Hugo) combined with Bootstrap for responsive design, resulting in fast loading times and good mobile optimization. The hosting on Hetzner nameservers suggests reliable infrastructure. The use of script and stylesheet integrity attributes is a positive security practice. However, SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility is good but could be improved with ARIA roles and landmarks. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of forms limits data collection but also reduces complexity and attack vectors. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beju-hh.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beju-hh.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.